Skip to main content

Is cdn-fileserver.com a Scam? Security Check Results - cdn-fileserver.com Reviews

C

Is cdn-fileserver.com Safe? Security Analysis for cdn-fileserver.com

Check if cdn-fileserver.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptCloudflare DNSConsentmanager.net CMPAkamaihd.net (for pixel tracking)Roboto font
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:34:51 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at cdn-fileserver.com currently serves as a placeholder with minimal content, displaying a message indicating the content is temporarily unavailable. There is no identifiable business information, branding, or descriptive content present. The site integrates consent management scripts indicating some level of GDPR compliance effort, but lacks visible privacy policies or terms of service. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and consentmanager.net for cookie consent management, with hosting likely on a CDN platform. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers detected. The domain WHOIS data is suspicious due to a future creation date and lack of registrant organization details, reducing trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears inactive or parked, with low business credibility and content quality.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCloudflare DNSConsentmanager.net CMPAkamaihd.net (for pixel tracking)Roboto font

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website content as it lacks company information, services, or market positioning. The domain registration details do not provide any registrant organization or contact information. The site appears to be a generic placeholder or parked domain with no active business operations or customer engagement features.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The domain WHOIS data is inconsistent with a future creation date, which is suspicious. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Consent management scripts are implemented, indicating some privacy compliance effort. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

No business description or company information is present on the website content.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCloudflare DNSConsentmanager.net CMPAkamaihd.net (for pixel tracking)Roboto font
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Media.net
Tracking Pixels:
Akamaihd.net pixel trackingConsentmanager.net tracking
Marketing Tools:
Consentmanager.net CMP
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and placeholder style with message 'Whoops! The content took a coffee break'.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cdn-fileserver.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/4/2025 (33 days)
SANs:cdn-fileserver.com, *.cdn-fileserver.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(232 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.96.1, 188.114.97.1
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3121::1, 2a06:98c1:3120::1
Name Servers:
cartman.ns.cloudflare.com
celine.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
93: route2.mx.cloudflare.net
39: route3.mx.cloudflare.net
39: route1.mx.cloudflare.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and fonts hosted on the same domain. It leverages Cloudflare DNS and consentmanager.net for GDPR cookie consent management. The site is hosted on a CDN infrastructure with external scripts for tracking and consent. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. The technical implementation is functional but minimal, consistent with a placeholder site.
Analyze Another Website