Skip to main content

Is ceafarming.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ceafarming.com Reviews

C

Is ceafarming.com Safe? Security Analysis for ceafarming.com

Check if ceafarming.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:36:57 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website ceafarming.com currently presents no accessible content, consisting solely of an empty HTML structure. This lack of content prevents any meaningful analysis of the business, its services, or its digital presence. The domain is registered with NameCheap, Inc. since October 2021, which aligns with a relatively new business but no further business details are available on the site. The absence of metadata, scripts, or external links indicates the site is either under development, inactive, or blocked. From a technical perspective, the website lacks any detectable technology stack, frameworks, or CMS. There is no evidence of security best practices such as security headers or DNSSEC, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. The SSL configuration is unknown but presumed basic due to lack of data. Mobile optimization and SEO cannot be assessed due to missing content. Security posture is minimal with no visible vulnerabilities but also no security enhancements. The domain registration is consistent and typical for a small business, but the lack of website content and policies reduces trustworthiness. No contact or incident response information is available, which is a compliance and trust concern. Overall, the website poses a low risk due to lack of content but also offers no value or trust signals to visitors. Strategic recommendations include launching a fully developed website with comprehensive privacy and security policies, implementing security headers and DNSSEC, and providing clear contact and business information to improve credibility and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of website content and metadata, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a relatively new entity possibly in early stages of development. No market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams are identifiable. No partnerships or subsidiaries are mentioned. The lack of contact or company information limits insights into target customers or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is minimal and immature. No security headers or advanced configurations are detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for domain security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response contacts are missing, reducing readiness for security events. The domain registration is standard with no privacy protection, which is appropriate for a small business. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Develop and publish a complete website with meaningful content and metadata.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is minimal (empty HTML body), indicating possible blocking or placeholder page. No actual content to analyze.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is completely empty (no metadata, no visible content).

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.162 include:_spf.if28.nano.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(57 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.162
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lv
ns2.nano.lv
MX Records:
0: ceafarming.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073006, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:122ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.162 include:_spf.if28.nano.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently consists of an empty HTML page with no detectable technologies, scripts, or frameworks. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The domain is registered with NameCheap, Inc. but no DNSSEC is enabled. The technical infrastructure appears minimal and likely incomplete or inactive.
Analyze Another Website