Skip to main content

Is cedar.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Cedar Reviews

cedar.com favicon

Is cedar.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cedar

Check if cedar.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareUnited Stateslarge
WordPress CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsHubSpot+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:51:30 AM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cedar is a leading healthcare financial technology company providing a comprehensive patient financial platform that integrates billing, payments, insurance navigation, and financial assistance. The platform is designed to improve patient experiences and provider revenue cycle management by connecting multiple stakeholders in the healthcare ecosystem. The website reflects a mature, professional business with strong branding, client testimonials, and multimedia content supporting their market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern analytics and marketing integrations including Google Analytics, HubSpot, Hotjar, and Apollo.io. It uses best practices for SEO and performance optimization, with responsive design and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly detailed. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image with extensive content and clear navigation. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data slightly reduces transparency but is likely due to privacy protection. The site is not blocked by WAF or security challenges, allowing full content access and analysis.

Detected Technologies

WordPress CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotVimeo (video hosting)Hotjar (behavior analytics)Apollo.io (website tracker)New Relic (performance monitoring)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cedar operates in the healthcare and technology sectors, targeting healthcare providers and payers with a SaaS financial engagement platform. Their competitive advantage lies in integrating payers, financial assistance, and AI-powered support into a unified billing experience. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and service contracts with healthcare organizations. The company demonstrates strong market presence with notable clients and a comprehensive resource center. Partnerships with social media and video platforms enhance their marketing reach. Growth indicators include recent case studies and product updates visible on the site.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Third-party scripts are used extensively but appear to be from reputable sources. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected in the content or technical analysis.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website to enhance transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cedar

Description:

Cedar offers a complete patient financial platform that empowers patients to pay bills, navigate insurance, and gain coverage with a simple platform connected to EHR systems. It integrates payers, financial assistance, and more to improve patient financial experiences and provider revenue cycle management.

Key Services:
Patient billing and paymentsInsurance navigationFinancial assistance integrationAI-powered patient supportPayer integration
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress CMSjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotVimeo (video hosting)Hotjar (behavior analytics)Apollo.io (website tracker)New Relic (performance monitoring)
Frameworks:
Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot AnalyticsHotjar
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagHotjar
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotApollo.io
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com include:5672097.spf06.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@cedar.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cedar.com
Issuer:E7
Valid Until:11/28/2025 (83 days)
SANs:*.cedar.com, *.enclave.cedar.com, cedar.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(621 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.108.62, 104.18.111.62, 104.18.110.62, 104.18.109.62, 104.18.107.62
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:6e3e, 2606:4700::6812:6f3e, 2606:4700::6812:6b3e, 2606:4700::6812:6c3e, 2606:4700::6812:6d3e
Name Servers:
henry.ns.cloudflare.com
reza.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382072320, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:52ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com include:5672097.spf06.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar, and New Relic for monitoring. Performance is optimized with lazy loading images and responsive design. SEO is enhanced via Yoast plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. Accessibility features such as screen reader text and keyboard navigation are present. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and marketing but maintains a professional and secure configuration. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified.
Analyze Another Website