Skip to main content

Is cedarlakeventures.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc. Reviews

cedarlakeventures.com favicon

Is cedarlakeventures.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc.

Check if cedarlakeventures.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptCSSSVG
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 12:45:52 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc. operates a portfolio of web properties primarily focused on image processing, data visualization, and location-based services. The main website serves as a centralized billing and account management platform for these properties, providing users with a unified login and payment experience. The company has established a stable market presence since its domain registration in 2013 and maintains a consistent brand identity across its subsidiaries. Technically, the website is hosted on Amazon AWS CloudFront CDN, employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript and SVG, and demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections, though there is room for improvement in implementing security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and terms pages present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSSVG

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a technology service provider specializing in billing and account management for a diverse set of web properties that offer vectorization, image background removal, weather data visualization, demographic reporting, and augmented reality applications. Its business model revolves around providing SaaS tools and APIs to end users, primarily targeting digital artists, marketers, researchers, and developers. The portfolio of subsidiaries indicates a diversified product ecosystem, enhancing cross-selling and customer retention opportunities. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on self-service and automated support. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding, which supports credibility and market trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain registration protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, indicating a mature security approach to domain management. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which may hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting and response. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc.

Description:

Billing and account management services for web properties owned by Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc.

Key Services:
Billing and account managementHosting and operation of multiple web properties
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSSVG
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website serves as a billing and account management portal for multiple web properties owned by Cedar Lake Ventures, Inc.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

100/100
Score
No issues found
SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:654288754b73e@ag.dmarcly.com
Forensic Reports:654288754b73e@fo.dmarcly.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.19, 3.174.113.22, 3.174.113.49, 3.174.113.67
Name Servers:
ns-1291.awsdns-33.orgDNS only
ns-1725.awsdns-23.co.ukDNS only
ns-441.awsdns-55.comDNS only
ns-559.awsdns-05.netDNS only
MX Records:
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and SVG graphics. It leverages Amazon AWS CloudFront CDN for hosting and asset delivery, contributing to fast load times and global availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and supports multiple languages via locale switching. No CMS or major frameworks were explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. SEO is supported with meta tags and hreflang attributes for internationalization. Accessibility is basic but present. There is no evidence of heavy analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Technical risks include the absence of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Analyze Another Website