Skip to main content

Is cfcsa.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - The Canadian Federation of Construction Safety Associations Reviews

T

Is cfcsa.ca Safe? Security Analysis for The Canadian Federation of Construction Safety Associations

https://cfcsa.ca

Check if cfcsa.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCanadamedium
jQuery 3.2.1Foundation CSS frameworkKendo UI 2018.1.117CreateJSGoogle Analytics+3 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:12:05 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Canadian Federation of Construction Safety Associations (CFCSA) is a Canadian non-profit umbrella organization representing provincial and territorial construction safety associations. It focuses on promoting construction workplace health and safety awareness, facilitating information sharing, and collaboratively producing standards and training resources such as the COR®, NCSO®, and NHSA™ programs. The organization serves as a national federation to unify and support member associations across Canada, targeting construction employers, workers, and safety professionals. Technically, the website employs a modern but somewhat dated technology stack including jQuery, Foundation CSS, Kendo UI, and CreateJS for interactive graphics. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Translate for multilingual support. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and accessible at a basic level, though some improvements in accessibility and SEO could be made. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and a published security or incident response policy. No cookie consent mechanism is present, which may impact privacy compliance. The WHOIS data shows a domain age consistent with the organization's history, registered with a Canadian registrar, though registrant details are partially missing. No suspicious or malicious content was detected. Overall, the CFCSA website is a credible, professional platform serving a specialized non-profit sector with moderate technical maturity and a solid business reputation. Enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would improve its security posture and regulatory alignment.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.2.1Foundation CSS frameworkKendo UI 2018.1.117CreateJSGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Translate widgetFontAwesome 5.3.1Adobe Animate (for graphics)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CFCSA holds a strong market position as the national federation for construction safety associations in Canada, providing a collaborative platform for member organizations. Its business model is non-profit and focused on standardization, training, and awareness in construction health and safety. The organization leverages partnerships with provincial and territorial associations, each with their own websites and programs. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and program certifications. The target customers are construction employers, workers, and safety professionals across Canada. The website reflects a mature organization with a stable presence since 2008 and a consistent brand identity. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, linking to multiple member association domains, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for reporting security incidents. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy compliance indicators suggests gaps in regulatory adherence, particularly for GDPR. No vulnerable libraries or known exploits were detected in the front-end code. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but could be significantly improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Canadian Federation of Construction Safety Associations

Description:

The Canadian Federation of Construction Safety Associations (CFCSA) works as an umbrella organization for provincial and territorial construction safety associations with a shared interest in promoting awareness of construction health and safety, improving information sharing, and producing workplace health and safety training resources.

Key Services:
Promoting awareness of construction workplace health and safety practicesInformation sharing and customization among membersCollaborative production of standards and resourcesHosting events and meetingsProviding COR®, NCSO®, NHSA™ program information
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.2.1Foundation CSS frameworkKendo UI 2018.1.117CreateJSGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Translate widgetFontAwesome 5.3.1Adobe Animate (for graphics)
Frameworks:
Foundation
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfc11.megamailservers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

37 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(960 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:3.97.241.42
Name Servers:
braelyn.ns.cloudflare.com
gannon.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
15: mx3c11.megamailservers.com
10: mx2c11.megamailservers.com
5: mx1c11.megamailservers.com
SOA:Serial: 2384599592, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:51ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfc11.megamailservers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of older and modern web technologies including jQuery 3.2.1, Foundation CSS framework, Kendo UI from 2018, and CreateJS for animations. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Translate for analytics and multilingual support. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS with HTTPS enabled, ensuring secure transport. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags. However, some technical debt is evident from older library versions and lack of modern security headers. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about cfcsa.ca

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website