Skip to main content

Is cgconverge.com a Scam? Security Check Results - cgconverge.com Reviews

C

Is cgconverge.com Safe? Security Analysis for Error

Check if cgconverge.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ASP.NETJavaScript
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 6:53:48 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The analyzed page is an error page from cgconverge.com indicating an invalid URL parameter. The domain is registered since 2008 with Network Solutions, showing a long-standing presence. The website uses ASP.NET Web Forms technology and includes a Dynatrace monitoring script, indicating some level of performance monitoring. However, the page content is minimal, with no visible business information, privacy policies, or contact details. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC reduces the security posture. Overall, the site appears legitimate but the analyzed page does not provide sufficient content to assess the full business or security maturity.

Detected Technologies

ASP.NETJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the error page nature of the content, no direct business intelligence could be extracted. The domain age and registrar suggest a stable business presence. No information on market positioning, services, or partnerships is available from this page. The business sector and model cannot be determined from the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is limited based on the available data. The domain has clientTransferProhibited status which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the HTML content. The presence of Dynatrace monitoring indicates some operational monitoring. Error handling reveals internal error messages which could be improved to avoid information leakage. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies was found.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ASP.NETJavaScript
Frameworks:
ASP.NET Web Forms
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Dynatrace (ruxitagentjs)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
ruxitagentjs_ICANVfqru_10321250808084810.js
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

The page is an error page indicating an invalid URL parameter.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:demwfigj@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:demwfigj@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:198.12.19.211
Name Servers:
dns1.tcmsp.netDNS only
dns2.tcmkt.netDNS only
MX Records:
20: mailstore1.secureserver.net.cgconverge.com
10: smtp.secureserver.net
SOA:Serial: 1252017320, TTL: 14400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:342ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses ASP.NET Web Forms technology, indicated by the presence of __VIEWSTATE and __VIEWSTATEGENERATOR hidden fields. A Dynatrace JavaScript agent is used for performance monitoring. The domain is registered with Network Solutions and uses custom DNS servers (dns1.tcmsp.net, dns2.tcmkt.net). No CMS or modern frontend frameworks were detected. The page performance is moderate but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor due to minimal content and lack of responsive design elements. SEO optimization is also poor given the lack of metadata and structured data.
Analyze Another Website