Skip to main content

Is cheeze.com a Scam? Security Check Results - cheeze.com Reviews

cheeze.com favicon

Is cheeze.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cheeze | Loyalty Points Without Limits

Check if cheeze.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Framer
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:55:12 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'Cheeze | Loyalty Points Without Limits' presents a business focused on leveraging blockchain technology to make loyalty points liquid. The site is designed using Framer and features a modern, clean design with good mobile optimization and basic SEO. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data and absence of contact or privacy information limits the ability to fully verify the business legitimacy. Technically, the site is functional but lacks visible security headers and HTTPS confirmation, which are critical for trust and security. Overall, the security posture is weak, and privacy compliance is minimal. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Framer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cheeze operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on blockchain applications for loyalty points liquidity. The business model likely involves providing a platform or service that enables users or companies to convert loyalty points into liquid assets using blockchain. The target audience includes businesses and consumers interested in blockchain and loyalty programs. The site does not disclose company size, founding year, or parent company information, indicating a small or early-stage entity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the site. The lack of detailed business information and contact details suggests limited transparency, which could impact customer trust and growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

I*****@cheeze.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the website is low due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or security certifications. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms, reducing some risk, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses potential vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Immediate improvements in SSL/TLS implementation, security headers, and privacy documentation are recommended to mitigate risks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all site content is served securely.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

We make loyalty points liquid using blockchain technology

Key Services:
liquidity of loyalty pointsblockchain technology integration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:help@cheeze.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:site.cheeze.com
Issuer:ZeroSSL ECC Domain Secure Site CA
Valid Until:10/26/2025 (50 days)
SANs:site.cheeze.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:54.175.59.100, 13.219.143.230, 3.231.51.201
Name Servers:
ns-1478.awsdns-56.orgDNS only
ns-1963.awsdns-53.co.ukDNS only
ns-223.awsdns-27.comDNS only
ns-847.awsdns-41.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design tool, indicating a contemporary approach to UI/UX. The site loads assets from framerusercontent.com and fonts from Google Fonts, suggesting reliance on third-party CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. However, no CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal data collection. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security configurations and privacy features represents a technical risk. Opportunities exist to modernize security infrastructure and enhance SEO and accessibility features for better user engagement and compliance.
Analyze Another Website