Skip to main content

Is chen.info a Scam? Security Check Results - chen.info Reviews

chen.info favicon

Is chen.info Safe? Security Analysis for CHEN.info | 一個紀錄我們生活、旅遊、心情與域名投資的部落格

Check if chen.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:23:01 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

CHEN.info is a personal blog primarily in Traditional Chinese, focusing on documenting life events, travel experiences, moods, and domain name investments. The website has a long history dating back to 2008, indicating a stable presence in its niche. The blog targets a general audience interested in personal stories and domain investment insights. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a custom theme hosted by Site5, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. While the site has basic mobile optimization and SEO features, there is room for improvement in performance and accessibility. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. Contact options are limited to contact forms without direct email or phone contacts. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy as a personal blog but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates as a small-scale personal blog without commercial business operations or revenue streams evident. It serves a niche audience interested in personal life documentation and domain name investment commentary. The lack of direct business contact information and absence of commercial services suggest a hobbyist or personal use model. The site links to domain industry-related blogs, indicating engagement with the domain investment community. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and a large archive of posts. The site’s market position is that of a niche personal blog with moderate trustworthiness.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of chen.info is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is essential, but there is no DNSSEC configured for the domain, and no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. The site uses WordPress and several JavaScript libraries, but no known vulnerable versions or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. Overall, the site is at risk of common web vulnerabilities due to missing security best practices and lack of formal policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A blog recording life, travel, moods, and domain name investments.

Key Services:
blog contenttravel diariesdomain investment notes
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
WP Statistics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal blog primarily in Traditional Chinese.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:103.123.243.10 ip4:103.123.243.13 include:_spf.eee.tw +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

18 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3069 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:103.123.243.13
Name Servers:
ns83.g-dns.com
ns84.g-dns.com
MX Records:
0: chen.info
SOA:Serial: 2025072000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:207ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:103.123.243.10 ip4:103.123.243.13 include:_spf.eee.tw +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a custom 'diary' theme from Site5 hosting. It uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. Google Fonts are loaded via HTTP, which is a minor security concern and should be updated to HTTPS. The site includes multiple CSS and JS files for styling and functionality, including shortcodes and sliders. Performance is moderate with lazy loading for images. Accessibility and SEO are basic but could be improved with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. The site lacks advanced technical features such as structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata for social sharing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but dated and could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website