
Is chen.info Safe? Security Analysis for CHEN.info | 一個紀錄我們生活、旅遊、心情與域名投資的部落格
Check if chen.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
CHEN.info is a personal blog primarily in Traditional Chinese, focusing on documenting life events, travel experiences, moods, and domain name investments. The website has a long history dating back to 2008, indicating a stable presence in its niche. The blog targets a general audience interested in personal stories and domain investment insights. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a custom theme hosted by Site5, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. While the site has basic mobile optimization and SEO features, there is room for improvement in performance and accessibility. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. Contact options are limited to contact forms without direct email or phone contacts. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy as a personal blog but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The website operates as a small-scale personal blog without commercial business operations or revenue streams evident. It serves a niche audience interested in personal life documentation and domain name investment commentary. The lack of direct business contact information and absence of commercial services suggest a hobbyist or personal use model. The site links to domain industry-related blogs, indicating engagement with the domain investment community. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and a large archive of posts. The site’s market position is that of a niche personal blog with moderate trustworthiness.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of chen.info is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is essential, but there is no DNSSEC configured for the domain, and no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. The site uses WordPress and several JavaScript libraries, but no known vulnerable versions or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. Overall, the site is at risk of common web vulnerabilities due to missing security best practices and lack of formal policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
A blog recording life, travel, moods, and domain name investments.
good
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a personal blog primarily in Traditional Chinese.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 69 days
HSTS Not Enabled
MEDIUMHTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM18 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings