Skip to main content

Is chendianrong.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 寻书帮 Reviews

chendianrong.com favicon

Is chendianrong.com Safe? Security Analysis for 寻书帮

Check if chendianrong.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationChinasmall
jQuery 3.6.0WordPressPHPHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 7:50:39 PM
36
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

寻书帮 is a Chinese website providing a broad range of electronic book PDF downloads across numerous categories such as education, literature, history, law, medicine, and more. It targets a wide audience of Chinese-speaking readers seeking digital book resources. The platform aggregates and offers access to a large collection of e-books, positioning itself as a comprehensive resource for electronic book downloads. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and external scripts from Alibaba CDN and 51.la analytics. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with a moderate performance profile. However, it lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies, which impacts its compliance and security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but does not implement key security headers, and no explicit contact or incident response information is provided. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the site content is accessible and appears professionally maintained. No adult or explicit content is present, making it safe for general audiences. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to missing WHOIS data and limited privacy and security practices. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0WordPressPHPHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates in the education sector, focusing on digital content distribution of electronic books in PDF format. It serves a niche market of Chinese readers looking for academic, literary, and professional books. The business model appears to be content aggregation and distribution, possibly monetized through advertising or affiliate links, although no direct monetization details are visible. The platform covers a wide range of categories, indicating an attempt to capture diverse user interests. The lack of clear company information and domain registration data limits the ability to assess business scale or partnerships. The site’s market position is that of a resourceful e-book download hub with a broad content catalog.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. There is no visible incident response or security contact information, which reduces readiness for handling security incidents. The use of third-party analytics (51.la) introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

寻书帮

Description:

寻书帮网站提供电子书PDF下载服务,涵盖广泛的书籍分类,包括教育、文学、历史、法律、医学、艺术、计算机、管理、经济等多个领域,目标用户为需要电子书资源的读者。

Key Services:
电子书PDF下载电子书搜索分类浏览电子书
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0WordPressPHPHTML5CSS3
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
51.la
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
51.la
Marketing Tools:
51.la analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

30/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No MX records found

MEDIUM

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:45.119.99.234
Name Servers:
algernon.dnspod.netDNS only
cassiopeia.dnspod.netDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery 3.6.0 and uses external resources from Alibaba CDN and 51.la analytics. The HTML structure is standard and includes meta tags for viewport and Open Graph for social sharing. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure with categorized content. Performance is moderate, with some minified CSS and JS caching. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond jQuery. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a good baseline for content delivery. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and privacy compliance elements.
Analyze Another Website