Skip to main content

Is cherryproxy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Cherry Proxy Reviews

cherryproxy.com favicon

Is cherryproxy.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cherry Proxy

Check if cherryproxy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQueryFirebaseGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCookiebot+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:55:11 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cherry Proxy is a small technology company specializing in providing residential proxy IP services globally. The website positions itself as a cost-effective provider with a focus on concealed, safe, and fast proxy IP resources. The technical infrastructure leverages WordPress CMS, integrates Firebase for analytics, and uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and user behavior tracking. The site implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, enhancing privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, impacting overall trust. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency on security policies, adding clear contact information, and verifying domain registration details to enhance business credibility.

Detected Technologies

jQueryFirebaseGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCookiebotSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cherry Proxy operates in the proxy service market, targeting businesses and individuals requiring residential IP proxies. Its competitive advantage lies in cost-effectiveness and global IP coverage. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through proxy subscriptions and usage. The company partners with major payment processors like PayPal and Adyen, indicating a legitimate payment infrastructure. Growth potential exists given the increasing demand for proxy services in data scraping, privacy, and security sectors. However, lack of visible company registration and contact details may hinder trust and customer acquisition.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@cherryproxy.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. To improve, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security policies, and provide dedicated security contact channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cherry Proxy

Description:

Cherry Proxy provides high-quality global residential proxy IP resources that are concealed, safer, and faster.

Key Services:
Residential Proxy IPsSOCKS5 Proxy
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryFirebaseGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCookiebotSwiper.js
Frameworks:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFirebase Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSenseGoogle AdsDoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cherryproxy.com
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:9/22/2025 (51 days)
SANs:*.api.cherryproxy.com, *.cherryproxy.com, cherryproxy.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(49 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.13.96, 104.26.12.96, 172.67.71.154
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::ac43:479a, 2606:4700:20::681a:d60, 2606:4700:20::681a:c60
Name Servers:
celine.ns.cloudflare.com
venkat.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mx.zoho.com
20: mx2.zoho.com
50: mx3.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 2379388715, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:43ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Firebase, Google Tag Manager, and Swiper.js for UI components. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and deferred JavaScript. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta tags and CSS. SEO is supported by meta descriptions, keywords, and Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and labels present. The site uses a cookie consent banner powered by Cookiebot, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more transparent business information.
Analyze Another Website