Skip to main content

Is childrenparenting.com a Scam? Security Check Results - childrenparenting.com Reviews

C

Is childrenparenting.com Safe? Security Analysis for 亲亲育儿网-专业的母婴育儿知识网站 _Baby Parenting

Check if childrenparenting.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptPrototype.jsScriptaculous.jsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 12:06:48 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ChildrenParenting.com is a Chinese-language informational website focused on parenting, pregnancy, childbirth, infant and toddler care, health, nutrition, and early education. The site provides a range of articles and resources targeting parents and caregivers seeking trusted knowledge in these areas. The business model appears to be content publishing with partnerships to related parenting sites such as jnbaobao.com. The website was established in 2015 and maintains a moderate market position within its niche. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries like Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, with DNS managed via Cloudflare and domain registration through NameSilo, LLC. The site shows basic performance and mobile optimization but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. SEO and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or privacy and cookie policies. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits trust and compliance. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with no suspicious patterns detected. Overall, the website is functional and content-rich but requires significant improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trustworthiness and user experience.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptPrototype.jsScriptaculous.jsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets a niche market of Chinese-speaking parents and caregivers, offering specialized content on pregnancy, childbirth, and child care. It leverages partnerships with related sites like jnbaobao.com to enrich content offerings. The business model is primarily informational content publishing, likely monetized through advertising or affiliate links, though no explicit advertising networks were detected. The site has moderate brand consistency and a small operational scale. Growth opportunities exist through enhanced digital marketing, improved user engagement, and expanded content quality. The partnership ecosystem includes several health and parenting-related domains, indicating a focused content network. The absence of clear business contact information and certifications suggests a small or informal business structure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic and presents several gaps. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers exposes the site to DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. Lack of visible HTTPS enforcement and privacy policies indicates potential compliance issues with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, reducing the ability to handle security incidents effectively. No vulnerable libraries were explicitly detected, but the use of older JavaScript frameworks may pose risks if not updated. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to improve its security maturity and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

亲亲育儿网(childrenparenting.com)为父母提供怀孕分娩,胎教,育儿,保健,喂养,常见病护理,早教知识.值得信赖的专业育儿网站.

Key Services:
Pregnancy guidanceChildbirth informationInfant and toddler careHealth and nutrition adviceEarly education knowledge
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptPrototype.jsScriptaculous.jsCloudflare DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is in Chinese and targets parents and caregivers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

18 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:childrenparenting.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/7/2025 (35 days)
SANs:childrenparenting.com, *.childrenparenting.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(214 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.216.106, 104.21.45.159
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3032::ac43:d86a, 2606:4700:3035::6815:2d9f
Name Servers:
patryk.ns.cloudflare.com
tara.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2375375891, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using older JavaScript libraries Prototype.js and Scriptaculous.js, indicating legacy technology usage. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing some resilience and performance benefits, but DNSSEC is not enabled. The site does not appear to use a modern CMS or frameworks, and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags were detected beyond basic meta tags.
Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description present but no advanced SEO features. The site structure is content-rich but the design and navigation are dated. There is no evidence of modern frontend frameworks or responsive design techniques. Technical debt is present due to legacy scripts and lack of modern security practices.
Analyze Another Website