Skip to main content

Is chinafactcheck.com a Scam? Security Check Results - chinafactcheck.com Reviews

C

Is chinafactcheck.com Safe? Security Analysis for 有据 | 国际新闻事实核查

Check if chinafactcheck.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaChinasmall
jQuery 2.2.4
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 1:40:43 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ChinaFactCheck.com is a Chinese language fact-checking website specializing in verifying international news. Founded in 2020, it provides fact-check reports, user-submitted verification requests, and fact-checking tools. The site targets Chinese-speaking users interested in accurate international news verification. The business operates as a niche media platform with a small team and focuses on content publishing and fact-checking services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and uses jQuery 2.2.4. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. However, there is no evidence of advanced SEO or accessibility features. The hosting and domain registration are managed via GoDaddy, with no DNSSEC enabled and no visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content. From a security perspective, the site shows basic domain protection via registrar status flags but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided. There are no signs of malicious content or adult material, and the site appears safe for general audiences. The overall risk is moderate due to missing privacy and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing DNSSEC, adding HTTPS enforcement with security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact information for security and business inquiries to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ChinaFactCheck.com occupies a niche market in Chinese-language international news fact-checking. Its competitive advantage lies in providing timely verification reports and AI-driven fact-checking tools. The business model is content-driven, likely supported by donations or sponsorships, though no monetization details are visible. The target audience is Chinese internet users seeking reliable news verification. The site shows consistent branding and a professional content approach but lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. Growth potential exists in expanding tool offerings and establishing partnerships with media organizations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with domain registration protections but lacks modern security measures such as DNSSEC and security headers. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details and security policies indicates gaps in compliance and risk management. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may hinder timely handling of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A Chinese language international news fact-checking website providing verification reports and fact-checking tools.

Key Services:
Fact-checking reportsFact-checking toolsUser-submitted fact-check requests
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese language fact-checking platform focused on international news.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=300, max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(193 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:160.153.0.173
Name Servers:
ns33.domaincontrol.com
ns34.domaincontrol.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with a custom theme and jQuery 2.2.4 library. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and cache control. The site loads assets from its own domain and domaincontrol.com for DNS. Performance is moderate with no heavy external scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good with viewport and apple-touch icons configured. SEO optimization is basic with meta keywords but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility features are minimal. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC are technical risks. Hosting appears standard with GoDaddy as registrar but no hosting provider explicitly identified.
Analyze Another Website