Skip to main content

Is churchgatepartners.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Churchgate Advisory Private Limited Reviews

C

Is churchgatepartners.com Safe? Security Analysis for Churchgate Advisory Private Limited

Check if churchgatepartners.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceIndiasmall
jQueryBootstrap v4.4.1Font AwesomeAOS (Animate On Scroll)Owl Carousel+4 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:10:47 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Churchgate Partners is a specialized international investor relations advisory firm based in India, established in 2009. The company provides tailored investor relations programs and digital platforms to corporate clients, focusing on global equity market engagement. Their services include communication materials, research analyst access, investor targeting, market perception studies, corporate planning, transaction support, and ESG disclosure facilitation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and a LinkedIn presence, supporting their market position as a trusted advisor in the finance sector. Technically, the website employs a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI libraries, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with no major technical issues detected. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks are identified, indicating a custom or static site approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and formal privacy or cookie policies. The contact form uses EmailJS for email sending but lacks CAPTCHA or bot mitigation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. These gaps suggest moderate security maturity with room for improvement in compliance and protection measures. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally presented, with a strong business credibility score. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited security headers reduce privacy compliance and security posture scores. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's security and regulatory compliance, supporting long-term business trust and resilience.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrap v4.4.1Font AwesomeAOS (Animate On Scroll)Owl CarouselSlick CarouselMagnific PopupNivo SliderModernizr

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Churchgate Partners operates in the finance sector as an investor relations advisory firm targeting corporate clients and institutional investors globally. Their competitive advantage lies in combining traditional advisory services with digital platforms for investor and broker directories, ESG disclosures, and results tracking. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on bespoke investor relations programs and technology-enabled tools. Revenue streams likely include advisory fees and platform subscriptions. The company maintains a professional partnership ecosystem including ESG World and digital service platforms under its domain. Growth indicators include a long-established domain and consistent branding. The company is positioned as a niche player with a strong focus on compliance and market intelligence in investor relations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@churchgatepartners.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+9122616*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and formal privacy and cookie policies indicates gaps in security best practices and regulatory compliance. The contact form lacks CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures, increasing risk of spam or abuse. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident, limiting preparedness for security incidents. Data protection practices are not explicitly documented, and GDPR compliance is not demonstrated. Overall, the security culture appears basic with opportunities to enhance protection, compliance, and incident readiness to better safeguard business and client data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Churchgate Advisory Private Limited

Description:

Churchgate Partners is an international investor relations advisor that works closely with its corporate clients in designing and implementing investor relations programs to meet their specific requirements. Their objective is to deliver independent advice and insightful analysis on the best practices of interacting with global equity markets.

Key Services:
Communication MaterialsResearch Analyst AccessGlobal Investor AccessMarket Perception StudiesCorporate PlanningTransaction SupportESG Disclosure PlatformInvestor Relations Digital Tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrap v4.4.1Font AwesomeAOS (Animate On Scroll)Owl CarouselSlick CarouselMagnific PopupNivo SliderModernizr
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS links in navigation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact form uses JavaScript email sending with EmailJS

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1588 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:52.172.133.156
Name Servers:
ns1-02.azure-dns.com
ns2-02.azure-dns.net
ns3-02.azure-dns.org
ns4-02.azure-dns.info
MX Records:
0: churchgatepartners-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.6.0, Font Awesome, AOS, Owl Carousel, Slick, Magnific Popup, and Nivo Slider. It is hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable hosting. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content structure. No CMS or server-side frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with no broken elements or errors observed. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and security headers, and absence of bot protection on forms. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving accessibility, and enhancing security configurations.
Analyze Another Website