Skip to main content

Is cietkoks.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Cietkoks Reviews

cietkoks.lv favicon

Is cietkoks.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Cietkoks

Check if cietkoks.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
WordPressjQueryBootstrapResponsive LightboxSimple Lightbox
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:15:14 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Cietkoks is a Latvian small manufacturing business specializing in birch wood products including solid boards, blanks for laminated panels and furniture parts, custom beams, and specialized design solutions such as architectural details and stage decorations. The company targets manufacturers, builders, and designers seeking quality wood materials. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure, using common plugins for responsive design and image galleries. The site is mobile optimized and provides clear navigation and professional content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy policy is present but cookie and terms of service policies are missing. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting full domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryBootstrapResponsive LightboxSimple Lightbox

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cietkoks operates in the manufacturing sector focused on wood products, particularly birch. The business model is direct manufacturing and sales with a focus on custom solutions. The presence of FSC certification indicates commitment to sustainable sourcing, which is a competitive advantage. The website content is targeted at regional customers in Latvia and possibly neighboring markets. The company appears to be small-sized with no indication of subsidiaries or parent companies. The lack of social media presence and limited contact information suggests a focused but modest digital footprint. The business could benefit from expanding digital marketing and compliance transparency to enhance market reach and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712610****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency in security practices. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates partial GDPR compliance. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cietkoks

Description:

Cietkoks offers birch wood products including solid birch boards, birch blanks for laminated panels and furniture parts, beams made to customer specifications, and specialized design solutions such as architectural details, stage decorations, and retail design solutions.

Key Services:
Birch solid wood boardsBirch blanksCustom beamsSpecialized design and architectural wood solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryBootstrapResponsive LightboxSimple Lightbox
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:91.105.203.38
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.latnet.lv
30: mx3.latnet.lv
20: mx2.latnet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:199ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a Sydney theme and plugins such as Responsive Lightbox and Simple Lightbox for image galleries. It uses jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality and styling. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization detected. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen reader text present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and alternate language links but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags found. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small business website but could be improved with enhanced performance and accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website