Skip to main content

Is circle-solutions.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Circle Solutions Reviews

circle-solutions.com favicon

Is circle-solutions.com Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Circle Solutions

Check if circle-solutions.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
BootstrapjQueryFont AwesomeFlexsliderBxSlider+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:52:59 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Circle Solutions is a Latvia-based IT services company founded in 2017, specializing in software development, implementation, and support across various industries. Their offerings include custom software development, mobile and desktop applications, DevOps, UI/UX design, QA/testing, e-commerce solutions, and internet advertising services. The company targets businesses of all sizes, emphasizing quality, deadline adherence, and multilingual capabilities. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with client testimonials reinforcing trust. Technically, the website employs a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and several UI libraries, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features and does not appear to use a CMS. Hosting and domain registration are stable but lack DNSSEC and visible security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from domain status but not explicitly confirmed in HTML), but no security headers or privacy/cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and general best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. Contact is only via a web form, with no direct emails or phone numbers visible, which may impact user trust and support responsiveness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security hardening, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving direct contact availability.

Detected Technologies

BootstrapjQueryFont AwesomeFlexsliderBxSliderOwl CarouselWOW.jsSuperfishParallax Slider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Circle Solutions operates as a small-sized IT services provider focusing on software development and support for diverse industries. Their business model centers on delivering custom software solutions, dedicated development teams, and marketing automation tools. The company leverages multilingual expertise to serve a broad client base. Market positioning is that of a reliable, deadline-conscious partner with a comprehensive service portfolio. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based development, ongoing support contracts, and marketing services. The absence of visible partnerships or subsidiaries suggests a focused, independent operation. Growth indicators include a stable domain age and consistent branding. The company maintains a professional online presence but lacks published certifications or compliance attestations, which could be strategic areas for development.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The domain is registered with clientTransferProhibited status, enhancing domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers (such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) are detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The website uses standard JavaScript libraries without detected vulnerable versions, and no exposed sensitive data or credentials were found. Overall, the security maturity is basic, suitable for a small IT service provider but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Circle Solutions

Description:

Circle Solutions offers a full range of services for development, implementation, and support of IT solutions for any industry. They provide software development, testing, deployment, maintenance, administration, and support services. They cater to both big and small projects and have multilingual specialists (English, Russian, Latvian).

Key Services:
Custom software developmentDevOps servicesDedicated development centerSoftware development and supportUI/UX design developmentQA and testingMobile and desktop application developmentE-commerce solutionsMarketing automationInternet advertising services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
BootstrapjQueryFont AwesomeFlexsliderBxSliderOwl CarouselWOW.jsSuperfishParallax Slider
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:23.111.31.154
Name Servers:
ns-canada.topdns.comDNS only
ns-uk.topdns.comDNS only
ns-usa.topdns.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: relay1.relay4.xyz
20: relay2.relay4.xyz
30: relay3.relay4.xyz
40: relay4.relay4.xyz
SOA:Serial: 2024013003, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:141ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a classic front-end technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and several UI enhancement libraries like Flexslider, BxSlider, Owl Carousel, WOW.js, and Superfish. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. Performance is moderate, with scripts loaded at the end to improve page load times. SEO optimization is basic, with meta description and viewport tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting details are limited to registrar information; no CDN or cloud hosting provider is identified. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Analyze Another Website