Skip to main content

Is cisa.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - cisa.gov Reviews

C

Is cisa.gov Safe? Security Analysis for Access Denied

Check if cisa.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentN/aenterprise
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:47:59 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at cisa.gov is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall or security blocking mechanism, as evidenced by the 'Access Denied' page and minimal HTML content referencing errors.edgesuite.net. This prevents direct analysis of the site's content, policies, or contact information. The domain is registered under a government-focused registrar with privacy protection enabled, which is somewhat unusual but may be justified given the nature of the site. The domain age aligns with a relatively recent establishment in 2018, consistent with a government agency's digital presence. Due to the blocking, no metadata, scripts, or business details could be extracted, limiting the assessment of technical infrastructure and digital maturity. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers is noted as areas for improvement. Overall, the site appears legitimate but inaccessible for detailed analysis, resulting in a low AI score and recommendations to address blocking and improve transparency.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain and registrar, the entity is likely a government agency focused on cybersecurity or infrastructure security. The domain age and registration status support this. However, no direct business information, services, or partnerships are visible due to content blocking. The business model is presumably public sector service provision with a focus on national security. No revenue streams or customer segments can be identified from the data. The lack of visible contact or policy information limits insights into operational transparency or stakeholder engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture assessment is constrained by the lack of accessible content. The presence of a WAF or security blocking mechanism indicates some level of security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers, as well as no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, suggests room for improvement. No exposed vulnerabilities or sensitive data were detected, but this cannot be confirmed without content access. The domain's privacy protection is unusual for a government site but may be a deliberate security measure. Overall, the security maturity appears moderate but unverifiable.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Review and adjust WAF/security settings to allow legitimate access for analysis and user access.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Access Denied page with minimal HTML content and reference to errors.edgesuite.net indicates a WAF or security blocking mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a WAF or security mechanism.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dhs.gov include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-00376703.gpphosted.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:DMARC@hq.dhs.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.homelandsecurity.gov
Issuer:DigiCert Global G3 TLS ECC SHA384 2020 CA1
Valid Until:11/19/2025 (74 days)
SANs:www.homelandsecurity.gov, awt.cbp.gov, bwt.cbp.gov +51 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(101 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.66.124.223
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:41:68f::3ff9, 2a02:26f0:41:690::3ff9
Name Servers:
blue.foundationdns.com
blue.foundationdns.net
blue.foundationdns.org
MX Records:
10: mxa-00376703.gslb.gpphosted.com
10: mxb-00376703.gslb.gpphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 2382580901, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dhs.gov include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-00376703.gpphosted.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Technical analysis is limited due to content blocking. The domain uses foundationdns name servers and is registered with get.gov, indicating a government-focused infrastructure. No CMS, frameworks, or scripts were detectable. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers is noted as a technical gap. Hosting provider details beyond DNS are not available. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears basic with potential for modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website