Skip to main content

Is citycarrier.com a Scam? Security Check Results - City Carrier Reviews

citycarrier.com favicon

Is citycarrier.com Safe? Security Analysis for City Carrier

Check if citycarrier.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationN/asmall
WordPressElementorAstra ThemeGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 11:50:47 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

City Carrier is a specialized provider of enterprise-grade logistic management solutions tailored for postal, delivery, and bus line operators. The company offers key products such as smartDelivery, routeXpander, and routeOptimizer, positioning itself as a niche player in the transportation software sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear product offerings targeting logistics businesses. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Astra theme, integrating Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to a contact form without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the domain is long-established and trustworthy, but the site would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorAstra ThemeGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

City Carrier operates in the transportation sector, focusing on software solutions for logistics and delivery companies. The business model centers on providing SaaS or enterprise software products that optimize delivery routes and parcel management. The company targets logistics operators, postal services, and bus line operators, indicating a B2B focus. The domain age (since 2002) suggests an established presence, though the website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise. The product suite and integrations hint at a competitive advantage in route optimization technology. The absence of direct contact details and limited public business information may indicate a controlled customer engagement approach, possibly relying on demos and direct sales. The company does not publicly display certifications or security policies, which could be areas for growth to enhance market trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@citycarrier.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response information, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Privacy compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with enhanced headers, policies, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

City Carrier

Description:

Enhance Your Business with Innovative Logistic Management Solutions Specifically Designed for Logistics, Postal and Bus Line Operators.

Key Services:
smartDeliveryrouteXpanderrouteOptimizer
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorAstra ThemeGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsreCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional business site for logistics software solutions

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +ip4:192.250.229.149 +include:spf.mysecurecloudhost.com +include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(494 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.250.229.149
Name Servers:
ns1.zonomi.com
ns10.citycarrier.com
ns2.zonomi.com
ns3.zonomi.com
ns4.zonomi.com
ns5.zonomi.com
ns6.zonomi.com
ns7.zonomi.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: citycarrier-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2431, TTL: 120s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +ip4:192.250.229.149 +include:spf.mysecurecloudhost.com +include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking purposes. The site uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization in place. Accessibility features are basic but present. The domain is registered with NameCheap and has a long history since 2002, which supports stability. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage information, enhancing search engine visibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Analyze Another Website