Skip to main content

Is citycoins.co a Scam? Security Check Results - CityCoins Reviews

citycoins.co favicon

Is citycoins.co Safe? Security Analysis for CityCoins

Check if citycoins.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryCloudflare Web AnalyticsFathom Analytics
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:25:02 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CityCoins operates a niche cryptocurrency platform that enables users to support their favorite cities while earning Bitcoin yield. The platform focuses on city-themed coins such as MiamiCoin and NYC Coin, targeting cryptocurrency enthusiasts and city supporters. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies including Webflow, Google Fonts, and integrates analytics tools like Cloudflare Web Analytics and Fathom Analytics. Hosting appears to be via Webflow with Cloudflare CDN, providing good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or terms of service documentation. WHOIS data is fully redacted, which is common in crypto projects but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryCloudflare Web AnalyticsFathom Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CityCoins positions itself as a specialized crypto platform focusing on city-based tokens, leveraging community engagement and Bitcoin yield incentives. The business model revolves around mining and investing in citycoins, appealing to crypto users interested in local impact. The platform's market presence is niche but growing, with active offerings for cities like Miami and New York City. The absence of detailed company information and contact data limits external trust signals. The use of modern web infrastructure and analytics indicates digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The platform could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies to strengthen credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no public security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program visible, which are important for user trust and compliance. The use of third-party scripts and analytics requires ongoing monitoring to avoid supply chain risks. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small crypto platform but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CityCoins

Description:

CityCoins are cryptocurrencies that allow you to support your favorite cities while earning yield in Bitcoin.

Key Services:
City-themed cryptocurrency miningBitcoin yield generationCommunity engagement for cities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryCloudflare Web AnalyticsFathom Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare Web Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Cloudflare Web AnalyticsFathom Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Cloudflare Web AnalyticsFathom Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:emsd1.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 15 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(243 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
crystal.ns.cloudflare.com
thaddeus.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382052353, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:emsd1.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS with integration of Google Fonts and jQuery libraries. It uses Cloudflare Web Analytics and Fathom Analytics for traffic monitoring. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Hosting is likely via Webflow with Cloudflare CDN, providing moderate performance. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. However, the absence of advanced security headers and formal compliance documentation indicates areas for modernization. The site’s JavaScript and CSS are minified and well-structured, supporting good user experience. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium crypto platform but can be enhanced with improved security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website