Is cityoffrederickmd.gov Safe? Security Analysis for City of Frederick, MD
Check if cityoffrederickmd.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
The City of Frederick, MD official website serves as a comprehensive portal for municipal government services, public information, and community engagement. It targets residents, businesses, and visitors by providing access to services such as payments, public meetings, parks and recreation, police information, and permits. The website is positioned as the authoritative digital presence for the city government, offering a broad range of resources and links to related government entities and services. Technically, the website utilizes a CivicPlus CMS platform with modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and AlpineJS. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Application Insights for analytics and telemetry. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features and moderate performance. Hosting and DNS are managed by reputable providers, though DNSSEC is not enabled. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes anti-forgery tokens in forms, but lacks visible security headers and DNSSEC. There is no published privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or security incident response information, which are gaps in compliance and transparency. The domain is a .gov domain with privacy-protected WHOIS data, consistent with government usage and legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and functional, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security header implementation, and clearer user privacy disclosures to improve its security posture and regulatory adherence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The City of Frederick operates as a municipal government entity providing essential public services and information to its community. Its digital presence supports transparency, civic engagement, and service delivery. The website's integration with government job portals, mapping services, and state government links indicates a well-connected ecosystem. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service rather than revenue generation. The site’s market position is as the primary official source for city-related information and services, with a medium-sized audience comprising local residents and businesses. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified for government security. The site’s partnerships with state and county government domains enhance its credibility and service reach.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Phone Numbers (2)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery tokens implemented, reducing risks of data interception and CSRF attacks. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and published security policies limits its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder timely response to security events. The use of reputable DNS and hosting providers is a positive factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
City of Frederick, MD
Official website of the City of Frederick, Maryland providing government services, public information, community events, and resources for residents and businesses.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- ServerTransferProhibited domain status
- Anti-forgery token implemented in forms
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Official municipal government website with comprehensive public services information
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 86 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings