
Is civiform.us Safe? Security Analysis for CiviForm
Check if civiform.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
CiviForm is an open-source software platform designed to help governments centralize and digitize application forms for public services, enabling residents to apply online efficiently. Developed initially by the City of Seattle with support from Google.org Fellowship and now stewarded by Exygy, it is collaboratively maintained by governments using the platform. The website reflects a medium-sized, government-focused technology initiative with a clear mission to improve administrative efficiency and accessibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern SEO and analytics tools, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and registrar services. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
CiviForm occupies a niche in government digital services, offering an open-source solution that reduces administrative costs and improves service delivery. Its business model is collaborative and stewardship-based, relying on partnerships with governments and support from organizations like Google.org. The platform targets government agencies and communities, emphasizing accessibility through multi-language support and streamlined application processes. The partnership ecosystem includes Exygy and Google.org, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth indicators include adoption by multiple communities and ongoing development. The website content and design support a professional image aligned with public sector technology initiatives.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, it lacks several security best practices such as DNSSEC, security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file or contact channels for security incidents limits incident response readiness. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not clearly indicated, and privacy policies are missing. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and privacy policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
CiviForm
CiviForm is open-source software for communities & governments. It is an open-source software solution for governments that helps centralize and digitize application forms so that residents can apply for government services online. Developed by the City of Seattle with pro bono support from Google.org Fellowship program, now stewarded by Exygy and collaboratively maintained by governments using it.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, YouTube
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 78 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings