Skip to main content

Is civiform.us a Scam? Security Check Results - CiviForm Reviews

civiform.us favicon

Is civiform.us Safe? Security Analysis for CiviForm

Check if civiform.us is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesmedium
WordPressElementorYoast SEOHubSpot FormsGoogle Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:50:24 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CiviForm is an open-source software platform designed to help governments centralize and digitize application forms for public services, enabling residents to apply online efficiently. Developed initially by the City of Seattle with support from Google.org Fellowship and now stewarded by Exygy, it is collaboratively maintained by governments using the platform. The website reflects a medium-sized, government-focused technology initiative with a clear mission to improve administrative efficiency and accessibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern SEO and analytics tools, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and registrar services. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOHubSpot FormsGoogle AnalyticsjQueryYouTube iframe API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CiviForm occupies a niche in government digital services, offering an open-source solution that reduces administrative costs and improves service delivery. Its business model is collaborative and stewardship-based, relying on partnerships with governments and support from organizations like Google.org. The platform targets government agencies and communities, emphasizing accessibility through multi-language support and streamlined application processes. The partnership ecosystem includes Exygy and Google.org, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth indicators include adoption by multiple communities and ongoing development. The website content and design support a professional image aligned with public sector technology initiatives.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, it lacks several security best practices such as DNSSEC, security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file or contact channels for security incidents limits incident response readiness. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not clearly indicated, and privacy policies are missing. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and privacy policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CiviForm

Description:

CiviForm is open-source software for communities & governments. It is an open-source software solution for governments that helps centralize and digitize application forms so that residents can apply for government services online. Developed by the City of Seattle with pro bono support from Google.org Fellowship program, now stewarded by Exygy and collaboratively maintained by governments using it.

Key Services:
Centralized application platform for government servicesMulti-language supportStreamlining and digitizing government assistance applications
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOHubSpot FormsGoogle AnalyticsjQueryYouTube iframe API
Frameworks:
WordPress CMSElementor page builder
Platforms:
Cloudflare DNS and registrar services
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot Forms
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:c265a34cbbad4a3f91b26d2dda7d7633@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(210 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.254.225.60
Name Servers:
lars.ns.cloudflare.com
serena.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381800618, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:119ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature and maintainable technical infrastructure. It integrates HubSpot forms for lead capture and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and registrar services, providing reliable DNS and domain management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and YouTube iframe API for embedded video content. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical foundation supports the business goals effectively with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Analyze Another Website