Is clarity-lang.org Safe? Security Analysis for Stacks Open Internet Foundation
Check if clarity-lang.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Clarity-lang.org is the official website for the Clarity smart contract language, designed to enable safer and more predictable smart contracts on the Bitcoin blockchain. The project is supported by the Stacks Open Internet Foundation and partners such as Hiro PBC and Algorand, positioning it as a niche but credible player in the blockchain technology sector. The website offers extensive developer resources, documentation, and links to GitHub repositories, targeting blockchain developers and enthusiasts interested in Bitcoin smart contracts. Technically, the site is built using the Tilda CMS platform, hosted via Cloudflare, and employs modern web technologies including JavaScript and jQuery. It demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration details are consistent with the business entity, enhancing trustworthiness. The site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The Clarity language project operates within the blockchain technology industry, focusing on smart contract development for Bitcoin. Its business model revolves around open-source software development and ecosystem support, with revenue likely derived from partnerships and developer engagement. The project benefits from academic design origins and backing by reputable organizations, giving it a competitive advantage in security and predictability of smart contracts. The target market includes blockchain developers and enterprises seeking secure smart contract solutions on Bitcoin. The partnership ecosystem with Stacks, Hiro PBC, and Algorand strengthens its market position and growth potential. The website's professional presentation and resource availability indicate a mature and focused operation.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website exhibits a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and formal security policies reduces its security maturity. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, minimizing attack surface. The lack of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is secure for informational purposes but should enhance security controls and compliance documentation to improve trust and resilience.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Stacks Open Internet Foundation
Clarity is a smart contract language designed for Bitcoin, enabling safer, predictable, and secure smart contracts on the Bitcoin blockchain. It is open-source and supported by the Stacks Ecosystem, Hiro PBC, and Algorand.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced (implied by Cloudflare hosting and canonical URL)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No forms detected that collect sensitive data
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed with clear focus on Clarity smart contract language.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 43 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings