Skip to main content

Is cleanzone.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - BC Systems Reviews

cleanzone.lv favicon

Is cleanzone.lv Safe? Security Analysis for BC Systems

Check if cleanzone.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressPHPJavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Open Sans)Enfold Theme 6.0.8+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:30:53 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website cleanzone.lv is currently under construction and contains minimal content, primarily a placeholder with a logo and a 'Coming soon' message. The business appears to be associated with 'BC Systems' based on the logo image, but no further business description or contact information is provided. The site uses WordPress with the Enfold theme and includes Google Fonts for typography. Technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with HTTPS enabled ensuring secure transport. However, no security headers or privacy-related policies are present, limiting the site's compliance and security posture. No forms or interactive elements are available to assess data collection or user engagement. Overall, the site lacks sufficient content and trust indicators to establish credibility or compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Open Sans)Enfold Theme 6.0.8jQuery (commented out/not active)Various Enfold Avia shortcodes scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of substantive content and absence of business details, it is difficult to ascertain the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The presence of the BC Systems logo suggests a branding identity, but no further information on services, sectors, or partnerships is available. The site targets a Latvian audience as indicated by the language and domain. The business size is likely small given the minimal online presence. No revenue streams, growth indicators, or strategic partnerships can be identified from the current data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields are present to evaluate secure data handling. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security contact information are also missing, which is a concern for transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is low, with recommendations to implement standard security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BC Systems

Description:

No business description available; website is under construction with minimal content.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Open Sans)Enfold Theme 6.0.8jQuery (commented out/not active)Various Enfold Avia shortcodes scripts
Frameworks:
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is under construction with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.24.88
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx4.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
30: aspmx5.googlemail.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1574368604, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:109ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme version 6.0.8, with various Enfold Avia shortcode scripts loaded. Google Fonts (Open Sans) are used for typography. jQuery scripts are present but commented out, indicating possible optimization or incomplete setup. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. No analytics or advertising scripts are detected, which limits tracking and marketing capabilities. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website