Skip to main content

Is clintonfoundation.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Clinton Foundation Reviews

clintonfoundation.org favicon

Is clintonfoundation.org Safe? Security Analysis for Clinton Foundation

Check if clintonfoundation.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Stateslarge
WordPress CMSYoast SEO pluginGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic monitoringFundraise Up donation widget+6 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:02:09 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Clinton Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization focused on philanthropy and social impact programs across the United States and globally. Their initiatives span economic opportunity, public health, climate action, and citizen engagement, leveraging the leadership experience of President Bill Clinton, Secretary Hillary Clinton, and Chelsea Clinton. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, comprehensive program information, and multiple avenues for engagement and support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics platforms such as New Relic, PostHog, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and monitoring tools, though explicit security headers and policies could be enhanced. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, no public security policy or incident response contacts were found, which could be improved to enhance trust and transparency. Overall, the Clinton Foundation website presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform that effectively supports its mission and stakeholder engagement. Strategic improvements in security transparency and policy publication would further strengthen its risk posture.

Detected Technologies

WordPress CMSYoast SEO pluginGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic monitoringFundraise Up donation widgetjQueryPostHog analyticsMicrosoft ClarityFacebook PixelTikTok PixelTwitter Universal Website Tag

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Clinton Foundation occupies a strong position in the non-profit sector with a focus on global social impact. Its business model centers on philanthropic programs, partnerships, and donor engagement. The foundation benefits from high brand recognition and a broad network of associated organizations and initiatives such as the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Presidential Center. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and fundraising events. The target audience includes donors, volunteers, partners, and the general public interested in social causes. The website's comprehensive content and clear navigation support growth and engagement objectives. The presence of multiple partner domains indicates a collaborative ecosystem enhancing program reach and effectiveness.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of monitoring and analytics tools, and cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact are gaps that could be addressed. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common and justified for large non-profits. Overall, the site maintains good security hygiene but could improve transparency and formalize incident response communications to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Clinton Foundation

Description:

The Clinton Foundation makes a difference in people’s lives across the United States and around the world through programs and partnerships that expand economic opportunity, improve public health, confront the climate crisis, and inspire citizen engagement and service.

Key Services:
Leadership developmentEconomic opportunity programsPublic health initiativesClimate crisis actionCitizen engagement and service
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress CMSYoast SEO pluginGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic monitoringFundraise Up donation widgetjQueryPostHog analyticsMicrosoft ClarityFacebook PixelTikTok PixelTwitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (implied by classes)Yoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
New RelicGoogle Analytics (via GTM)PostHogMicrosoft ClarityFacebook AnalyticsTikTok AnalyticsTwitter Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelTikTok PixelTwitter Universal Website TagMicrosoft ClarityPostHog
Marketing Tools:
Fundraise Up
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spfprod.ngpvan.com include:_spf.samanage.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:auidvp03ws@rua.powerdmarc.com
Forensic Reports:auidvp03ws@ruf.powerdmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(389 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.138.48, 172.66.134.5
Name Servers:
janet.ns.cloudflare.com
neil.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: clintonfoundation-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2381318006, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:345ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spfprod.ngpvan.com include:_spf.samanage.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and multiple analytics platforms for performance and user behavior tracking. The site uses jQuery and Bootstrap-like CSS classes for responsive design. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with video content and multiple external scripts, but mobile optimization and accessibility are good. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence, though ongoing maintenance of plugins and scripts is essential to avoid technical debt and security risks.
Analyze Another Website