Skip to main content

Is clintonhealthaccess.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Clinton Health Access Initiative Reviews

clintonhealthaccess.org favicon

Is clintonhealthaccess.org Safe? Security Analysis for Clinton Health Access Initiative

Check if clintonhealthaccess.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareUnited Stateslarge
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQuery+4 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:53:38 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) is a well-established nonprofit global health organization dedicated to improving healthcare access and outcomes worldwide. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive program information, transparency reports, and active engagement across multiple social media platforms. The organization operates in over 35 countries, focusing on infectious diseases, women and children's health, non-communicable diseases, and health systems strengthening. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks, optimized for SEO and accessibility, and employs robust security measures including HTTPS and security headers. Privacy compliance is evident with GDPR-compliant cookie and privacy policies. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure, which is common for organizations of this nature. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness with no critical security or content issues detected.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQuerySlick CarouselContact Form 7Search Filter ProShareThis

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CHAI holds a strong market position as a global health NGO with a broad portfolio of health programs and partnerships. Their business model centers on collaboration with governments, donors, and partners to catalyze equitable healthcare access. The organization leverages market shaping, strategic partnerships, and operational support to maximize impact. Their digital footprint and transparency efforts indicate a commitment to accountability and stakeholder engagement. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and social media. The website's content and structure support their mission and target audience effectively.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of GDPR-compliant recaptcha and cookie consent mechanisms further strengthens privacy protections. However, the lack of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represents an area for improvement. The site does not expose any critical security flaws, and the overall security score is high, reflecting good practices consistent with a reputable nonprofit organization.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Clinton Health Access Initiative

Description:

CHAI is a global health organization committed to saving lives, reducing the burden of disease and strengthening health systems.

Key Services:
Infectious Diseases programsWomen and Children's Health programsNon-Communicable Diseases programsHealth Systems strengtheningMarket ShapingCross-Cutting Expertise
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsjQuerySlick CarouselContact Form 7Search Filter ProShareThis
Frameworks:
Divi Theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of GDPR-compliant recaptcha
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
ShareThis
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed nonprofit global health organization site

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ptr ip4:64.206.20.134 ip4:144.121.10.100 a:mail.clintonhealthaccess.org mx:mail.clintonhealthaccess.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:_spf.samanage.com ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(724 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
ns1.worldnic.com
ns2.worldnic.com
MX Records:
20: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 125071610, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:271ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ptr ip4:64.206.20.134 ip4:144.121.10.100 a:mail.clintonhealthaccess.org mx:mail.clintonhealthaccess.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:_spf.samanage.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and several well-known plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Search Filter Pro. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, alongside social sharing tools like ShareThis. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by rich media content and third-party scripts. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting the organization's digital engagement and content delivery effectively.
Analyze Another Website