Skip to main content

Is cltfactory.com a Scam? Security Check Results - CLT Factory Reviews

cltfactory.com favicon

Is cltfactory.com Safe? Security Analysis for CLT Factory

Check if cltfactory.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Kadence ThemeKadence Blocks PluginjQuery 3.7.1CookieYes Consent Management
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:29:11 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CLT Factory is a specialized company focused on mass timber construction using CLT panels, serving construction companies and developers with high-quality raw timber structures. The company emphasizes precision, sustainability, and innovation, including proprietary moisture control protocols and the KLIK-KLIK Wall System. The website is built on WordPress with a professional design and includes a cookie consent mechanism and Google Analytics tracking. Contact information is limited to phone numbers and Instagram social media links. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is basic due to the absence of a privacy policy page. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Kadence ThemeKadence Blocks PluginjQuery 3.7.1CookieYes Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing and real estate sectors, targeting B2B customers such as construction firms, developers, architects, and partners. Founded in 2021, it leverages partnerships (e.g., klikklikwalls.com) and proprietary innovations to differentiate itself in the mass timber construction market. The business model focuses on supplying raw CLT structures and supporting assembly and logistics with specialized protocols. The website content and structure support a clear market positioning as an experienced and innovative niche player. Growth potential is indicated by the emphasis on sustainability and innovation, aligning with modern construction trends.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

I*****@CLTFACTORY.COM

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712654****
+4553767***

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The cookie consent mechanism is well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. The absence of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process indicates limited readiness for incident response and external security reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CLT Factory

Description:

Professional team with extensive experience in mass timber construction using CLT panels, providing construction companies and developers with high quality raw structures for further fitting out.

Key Services:
Supply of CLT raw building structuresMoisture control protocolsPrefabrication and assembly supportInnovative KLIK-KLIK Wall System
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Kadence ThemeKadence Blocks PluginjQuery 3.7.1CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Kadence theme and blocks.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 20% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:com.lmt.lv a:smtp.ltk.lv a:rin.tunt.lv a:smtp.tunt.lv a:ams.tunt.lv a:fra.tunt.lv a:gap.tunt.lv ip4:172.104.230.145 ip4:159.223.89.16 ip4:85.159.212.122 ip4:178.79.142.217 ip4:142.93.236.195 ip6:2a03:b0c0:2:f0::8:9001 ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91f f:fe18:0b42 ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe18:0fb3 ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fea8:b3ab ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe60:b31a ~all
DNS Lookups:9/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none(20% enforcement)
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(226 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:142.93.236.195
Name Servers:
ns37.domaincontrol.com
ns38.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
60: ams.tunt.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025032503, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:com.lmt.lv a:smtp.ltk.lv a:rin.tunt.lv a:smtp.tunt.lv a:ams.tunt.lv a:fra.tunt.lv a:gap.tunt.lv ip4:172.104.230.145 ip4:159.223.89.16 ip4:85.159.212.122 ip4:178.79.142.217 ip4:142.93.236.195 ip6:2a03:b0c0:2:f0::8:9001 ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91f f:fe18:0b42 ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe18:0fb3 ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fea8:b3ab ip6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe60:b31a ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Kadence theme and Kadence Blocks plugin, supported by jQuery and CookieYes for cookie management. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy as the registrar, though hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is moderate with some parallax and background images that may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content, though accessibility features are basic. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy documentation are recommended to reduce risk.
Analyze Another Website