Skip to main content

Is cncf.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Cloud Native Computing Foundation Reviews

cncf.io favicon

Is cncf.io Safe? Security Analysis for Cloud Native Computing Foundation

Check if cncf.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
WordPressJavaScriptNew Relic Browser AgentGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:54:25 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) is a leading non-profit organization dedicated to advancing cloud native computing technologies. As a vendor-neutral hub, CNCF supports a broad ecosystem of open source projects including Kubernetes, Envoy, and Prometheus. The foundation operates under the Linux Foundation umbrella, providing governance, training, certification, and community engagement to foster cloud native adoption globally. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, professional design, and clear navigation aimed at developers, enterprises, and open source contributors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates advanced analytics and consent management tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, New Relic, and Osano. Performance and mobile optimization are excellent, ensuring a smooth user experience. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly detailed. The security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is noted as an area for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified given the organization's profile. Overall, CNCF's website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel, and enhancing transparency around data protection officers and certifications to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressJavaScriptNew Relic Browser AgentGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsOsano Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CNCF occupies a dominant position in the cloud native technology sector as a non-profit foundation fostering open source innovation. Its business model revolves around supporting projects, providing training and certification, organizing flagship events like KubeCon, and building a global community. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and training services. The foundation targets technology companies, developers, and enterprises adopting cloud native solutions. Its partnership with the Linux Foundation enhances credibility and reach. The website content and linked domains reflect a robust ecosystem with extensive community engagement and project support. CNCF's strategic focus on vendor neutrality and open governance provides competitive advantage in the rapidly evolving cloud native market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

CNCF's website security posture is strong, leveraging HTTPS, modern security headers, and consent management tools to protect user data and privacy. No exposed credentials or sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable analytics and monitoring services indicates active performance and security monitoring. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. The absence of a security.txt file limits external security researchers' ability to report issues. Overall, CNCF demonstrates a mature security culture but should enhance transparency and formalize its security communication channels to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to inform users and stakeholders.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cloud Native Computing Foundation

Description:

CNCF is the vendor-neutral hub of cloud native computing, dedicated to making cloud native ubiquitous.

Key Services:
Project hosting and supportTraining and certificationEvents and conferencesCommunity buildingMarketing and legal services for projects
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressJavaScriptNew Relic Browser AgentGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot AnalyticsOsano Consent Management
Frameworks:
The SEO Framework (WordPress plugin)
Platforms:
Linux Foundation platformHubSpot
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
HubSpot AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerNew Relic Browser Agent
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot AnalyticsNew Relic
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotOsano Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:email.influitive.com include:8112310.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc+cncf@linuxfoundation.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cncf.io
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:11/2/2025 (57 days)
SANs:cncf.io, www.cncf.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(313 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:23.185.0.3
AAAA Records:2620:12a:8000::3, 2620:12a:8001::3
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns2.dnsimple-edge.net
ns3.dnsimple.com
ns4.dnsimple-edge.org
MX Records:
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 1557511278, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:email.influitive.com include:8112310.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a modern front-end leveraging JavaScript and CSS optimizations. It integrates multiple third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation, Google Tag Manager for analytics, New Relic for performance monitoring, and Osano for cookie consent management. The site is well optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with comprehensive SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, indicating attention to inclusive design. Hosting details are not explicit, but the use of Linux Foundation platforms and CDN services is evident. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable, secure, and user-friendly digital experience.
Analyze Another Website