Skip to main content

Is cnet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - CNET Reviews

cnet.com favicon

Is cnet.com Safe? Security Analysis for CNET

Check if cnet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Statesenterprise
JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringGoogle Tag ManagerAmazon AdsDoubleVerify+4 more
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:23:53 PM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CNET is a leading technology media website providing product reviews, tech news, software downloads, and daily deals to a global audience. Owned by Paramount Global, it holds a strong market position as a trusted source for consumer technology information. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with extensive use of modern JavaScript frameworks, performance monitoring via New Relic, and integration with major advertising and analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Amazon Ads, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly documented. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, CNET presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringGoogle Tag ManagerAmazon AdsDoubleVerifyPrebid.jsGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelChartbeat

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CNET operates primarily in the media sector, targeting general consumers interested in technology products and news. Its business model is advertising-supported, leveraging partnerships with major ad networks and affiliate programs. The company benefits from a strong brand reputation and a broad content offering that includes reviews, news, and video content. The parent company, Ziff Davis, provides additional corporate backing. The website's extensive use of tracking and analytics indicates a focus on data-driven marketing and user engagement strategies. No suspicious domains or practices were detected, and the site maintains good transparency in privacy and cookie management.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and implements key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, enhancing protection against common web threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. Incident response contact information is not provided, which could be improved to align with best practices. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and ad networks, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced disclosure and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CNET

Description:

Get full-length product reviews, the latest news, tech coverage, daily deals, and category deep dives from CNET experts worldwide.

Key Services:
Product reviewsTech newsSoftware downloadsDaily dealsVideo content
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptNew Relic monitoringGoogle Tag ManagerAmazon AdsDoubleVerifyPrebid.jsGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelChartbeat
Frameworks:
New Relic Browser Agent
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsChartbeatNew Relic
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Amazon AdsDoubleVerifyGoogle Ad ManagerMedianet
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelChartbeat
Marketing Tools:
New Relic
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf_c.oraclecloud.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1168-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:088836b424@rua.easydmarc.us

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:34.149.196.126
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:32ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf_c.oraclecloud.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

CNET's technical infrastructure is modern and robust, utilizing advanced JavaScript frameworks (likely Vue.js), comprehensive performance monitoring with New Relic, and integration with multiple advertising and analytics platforms. The site is optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates excellent SEO and accessibility practices. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the use of major ad and analytics providers indicates a scalable and professional hosting environment. The website loads quickly and provides a seamless user experience. Opportunities exist to further modernize by consolidating third-party scripts and enhancing security disclosures.
Analyze Another Website