Skip to main content

Is cnmstl.net a Scam? Security Check Results - cnmstl.net Reviews

C

Is cnmstl.net Safe? Security Analysis for 403

Check if cnmstl.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinasmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 2:37:57 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website cnmstl.net is currently inaccessible due to a security block returning a 403 error page. The page content is minimal and indicates that access is blocked due to potential security threats, suggesting the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The domain is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing in Beijing, China, with a creation date in 2015 and active registration until 2026, indicating a legitimate and established domain. However, no business information, contact details, or policies are available on the landing page, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or services. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript but lacks modern frameworks, SEO optimization, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility features. Security posture is weak with no visible HTTPS or security headers in the provided content.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website. The domain registration data suggests a China-based entity with a domain age consistent with a small business or organization founded around 2015. No information about market positioning, business model, or services is available. The lack of contact information and policies reduces business credibility and trust signals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is protected by a security mechanism that blocks access when suspicious activity is detected, as evidenced by the 403 error and warning message. While this indicates some level of security awareness, the absence of HTTPS information, security headers, and privacy policies on the accessible content suggests a low overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The security score is low due to limited data and lack of visible best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a 403 error page indicating access is blocked due to potential security threat. The page includes a message in Chinese stating the URL may cause security threats and access is blocked. This is consistent with a Web Application Firewall or security mechanism blocking access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security mechanism returning HTTP 403 error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.hwmail.com.cn ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 0 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(448 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:139.9.116.80
Name Servers:
dns10.hichina.com
dns9.hichina.com
MX Records:
20: mx2.hwmail.com.cn
10: mx1.hwmail.com.cn
SOA:Serial: 2025042409, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:303ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.hwmail.com.cn ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses minimal JavaScript and no detectable CMS or frameworks. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud Computing in Beijing. The site performance is likely slow due to minimal content and lack of optimization. The site is not mobile optimized and lacks accessibility features. SEO is poor with no meta tags beyond charset and title. The presence of a security block page limits further technical analysis. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and compliance.
Analyze Another Website