Skip to main content

Is codeberg.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Codeberg e.V. Reviews

codeberg.org favicon

Is codeberg.org Safe? Security Analysis for Codeberg e.V.

Check if codeberg.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitGermanymedium
Forgejo (Gitea fork)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3Mermaid.js
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:00:15 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Codeberg e.V. operates Codeberg.org as a non-profit, community-driven platform providing Git hosting and related services for free and open source software projects. Positioned as a privacy-respecting alternative to commercial code hosting platforms, it serves a diverse audience of developers, academics, and hobbyists. The organization emphasizes community values, transparency, and data privacy, hosting its services in Europe with no tracking or third-party cookies. Technically, the site is powered by Forgejo, a fork of Gitea, with custom modifications, delivering a fast, accessible, and mobile-optimized experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and CSRF protections, though improvements could be made by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. The domain registration uses privacy protection, which aligns with the organization's privacy focus and non-profit status. Overall, Codeberg.org demonstrates a mature digital presence with high trustworthiness and community engagement.

Detected Technologies

Forgejo (Gitea fork)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3Mermaid.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Codeberg e.V. holds a solid position in the open source hosting market as a non-profit alternative emphasizing privacy and community governance. Its business model relies on donations and membership contributions, supported by a transparent organizational structure based in Berlin. The platform's key services include Git hosting, CI/CD integration via Woodpecker CI, and translation services, appealing to a broad spectrum of open source contributors. Partnerships with Forgejo and active community involvement reinforce its competitive advantage. Growth indicators include a large user base (185,826 users) and extensive project hosting (286,381 projects). The absence of commercial advertising and tracking aligns with its mission and enhances user trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS, CSRF token implementation, and a domain status preventing unauthorized transfers. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response contact is available via abuse reporting channels, though a formal security policy and vulnerability disclosure process are not explicitly published. Privacy compliance is robust, with a comprehensive privacy policy and no tracking mechanisms, but cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the security culture appears mature but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Codeberg e.V.

Description:

Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led organization that aims to help free and open source projects prosper by giving them a safe and friendly home.

Key Services:
Git hostingCodeberg PagesCodeberg TranslateWoodpecker CIForgejo APIStatus Page
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Forgejo (Gitea fork)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3Mermaid.js
Frameworks:
Forgejo
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens used in forms
  • No tracking or third-party cookies
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:excellent

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1328-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Forensic Reports:postmaster@codeberg.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:codeberg.org
Issuer:E6
Valid Until:11/14/2025 (69 days)
SANs:codeberg.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1032 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:217.197.84.140
AAAA Records:2a0a:4580:103f:c0de::1
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsowl.com
ns2.dnsowl.com
ns3.dnsowl.com
MX Records:
10: smtp.codeberg.org
SOA:Serial: 1745528596, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Forgejo, a modern, open-source Git hosting platform forked from Gitea, using standard web technologies including JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS3. The site is well-structured with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with minimal loading times. The absence of a traditional CMS indicates a custom or platform-specific content management approach. Hosting details are not explicit but likely self-managed or privacy-focused. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Analyze Another Website