Is codeproject.com Safe? Security Analysis for CodeProject
Check if codeproject.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
CodeProject is a well-established online community platform founded in 1999, serving software developers worldwide by providing articles, discussions, and code resources. The platform is recognized for its extensive developer content and active community engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates Google Analytics and advertising services for monetization. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and domain registration protections but lacks DNSSEC and visible security headers, with no published security or incident response policies. Overall, the platform presents a trustworthy and professional presence with moderate risk exposure.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
CodeProject operates as a community-driven content platform targeting software developers, generating revenue primarily through advertising partnerships such as Google DoubleClick. Its market position is strong given its longevity and brand recognition in the developer community. The business model focuses on user-generated content and discussions, fostering engagement and knowledge sharing. Partnerships with developer media and related entities support its ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on community rather than direct sales or support. Growth indicators include continuous content publication and active discussions.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration safeguards in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which may impact transparency and readiness. The use of Cloudflare Turnstile indicates some bot mitigation efforts. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a content platform but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
CodeProject
Code Project is a developer community hub providing articles, discussions, and resources for software developers.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Domain status protections (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited)
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings