Skip to main content

Is coindrop.trade a Scam? Security Check Results - Domains By Proxy, LLC Reviews

coindrop.trade favicon

Is coindrop.trade Safe? Security Analysis for Domains By Proxy, LLC

Check if coindrop.trade is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Statesmedium
jQueryBootstrap 3.3.7GSAP TweenMaxEmbla CarouselTalk-Me live chat+1 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 8:49:19 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website coindrop.trade is a Russian-language cryptocurrency exchange assistant platform established in 2019. It offers P2P cryptocurrency exchange services, focusing on direct transactions without intermediaries, compliance with Russian regulations, and AML checks. The platform targets Russian-speaking crypto users and positions itself as a trusted exchange assistant with a moderate market presence. Technically, the site uses a mix of jQuery, Bootstrap, GSAP, and Embla Carousel for UI, with integrations for Yandex.Metrika analytics and Talk-Me live chat support. However, the mobile version is disabled, which limits accessibility for mobile users. Security posture is moderate with no advanced security headers or DNSSEC enabled, and privacy compliance is basic with no visible cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data shows domain privacy protection typical for crypto businesses, with a stable registration since 2019. Overall, the site is functional and moderately professional but could improve in security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrap 3.3.7GSAP TweenMaxEmbla CarouselTalk-Me live chatYandex.Metrika

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Coindrop.trade operates in the finance sector as a cryptocurrency exchange intermediary, offering services such as currency conversion and P2P exchange. Its competitive advantages include direct exchange without third-party processors, compliance with Russian 115-FZ law, and AML checks before providing payment details. The business model relies on transaction fees and providing a secure platform for crypto users. The target customers are Russian-speaking crypto traders seeking fast and reliable exchange services. The company leverages partnerships with monitoring services like BestChange and uses live chat support to enhance customer service. Growth indicators include a stable domain age and integration of modern web technologies, though disabling mobile access may hinder expansion. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of coindrop.trade is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via HTTPS) but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. The domain is privacy protected, which is common in crypto but reduces transparency. No explicit security or incident response policies are published. Forms collect user data such as email and transaction details but lack visible advanced protections or privacy notices. The site integrates third-party analytics and live chat, which may increase attack surface if not properly managed. Overall, the platform should enhance security headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish clear security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Domains By Proxy, LLC

Description:

Быстрый и безопасный обмен электронных валют с низкими комиссиями и поддержкой онлайн

Key Services:
Cryptocurrency exchangeP2P exchange platformCurrency conversionCustomer support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrap 3.3.7GSAP TweenMaxEmbla CarouselTalk-Me live chatYandex.Metrika
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of clientUpdateProhibited and related domain status flags

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Yandex.Metrika
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Yandex.Metrika
Marketing Tools:
Talk-Me live chat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Russian-language cryptocurrency exchange assistant platform

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "allow-from change.pro"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:130.185.123.201 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1360-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@coindrop.trade

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:185.215.235.3, 185.215.234.3
Name Servers:
a.ns.arvancdn.irDNS only
x.ns.arvancdn.irDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.coindrop.trade
SOA:Serial: 1757244632, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:50ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:130.185.123.201 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, GSAP TweenMax, and Embla Carousel for UI components, indicating a moderately modern but somewhat dated tech stack. It integrates Yandex.Metrika for analytics and Talk-Me for live chat support. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted CDNs and uses custom CSS for styling. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but DNS points to arvancdn.ir nameservers, which may indicate CDN usage. Performance is moderate with a preloader and carousel animations. Accessibility is basic, and mobile optimization is poor due to the disabled mobile version. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and improved mobile support.
Analyze Another Website