Is collab.land Safe? Security Analysis for Collab.Land
Check if collab.land is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Collab.Land is a technology company specializing in Web3 community management solutions, focusing on token-gated membership verification and engagement tools. The platform is well-established with over four years of operation and a significant user base, positioning itself as a trusted service in the crypto community space. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, delivering a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and official bot verification recommended, though improvements can be made by adding explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of public WHOIS data is mitigated by consistent branding and trust signals. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving a niche but growing market segment effectively.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Collab.Land operates a subscription-based SaaS model targeting Web3 community managers who require secure and automated token-based membership verification. The company benefits from a large and active user base, strong social media engagement, and a clear value proposition in the decentralized community management sector. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive support for multiple blockchains and wallets, and exclusive Pro Mini Apps that enhance community interaction. The business model is scalable and aligned with the growth of crypto communities. Partnerships with platforms like Discord and Telegram enhance its ecosystem integration. The company shows signs of steady growth and market relevance in the blockchain technology industry.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and recommendations for official bot verification to ensure community safety. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy policy presence, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Collab.Land
Collab.Land simplifies managing tokenized crypto communities by verifying membership based on token ownership and offers Pro Mini Apps via a Premier Subscription to enhance community engagement.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Official bot verification recommended
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 75 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
Unregistered MX Record
HIGHMX record points to unregistered domain: 6lfoe6hisibs2d7ijpz4z3cpxsmer3iwizq55trq3pyd54eoeuuq.mx-verification.google.com
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings