Skip to main content

Is colophon.info a Scam? Security Check Results - colophon Reviews

C

Is colophon.info Safe? Security Analysis for colophon

Check if colophon.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherNetherlandssmall
HTMLCSSCustom font-face (LincolnMITRE-LM5x7)
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:21:08 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Colophon is a small Amsterdam-based graphic design studio and type-design research initiative specializing in commissioned design work, research projects, free font distribution, and educational activities. The website serves as a detailed portfolio showcasing collaborations with cultural institutions, exhibitions, publications, and teaching engagements. The business targets design professionals, researchers, and cultural organizations with a niche focus on typography and graphic design research. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, including a custom font-face. It lacks modern frameworks, CMS, or advanced hosting details. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but has basic accessibility and SEO features. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which lowers its compliance posture. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, common for small creative businesses, but limits transparency. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface, but incident response and security policies are absent. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy in content and business credibility but would benefit from improved security practices, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trust and resilience.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSCustom font-face (LincolnMITRE-LM5x7)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Colophon operates in a specialized creative sector focusing on graphic design and typeface research. Its competitive advantage lies in its academic and cultural collaborations, detailed project documentation, and free font offerings. The business model combines commissioned work, research initiatives, and educational roles. The target customers are cultural institutions, artists, and design professionals. The extensive external references and publications indicate a well-networked presence in the design community. Growth potential may be limited by niche focus but supported by strong reputation and partnerships.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@colophon.info

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level due to absence of HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and lack of privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The minimal attack surface due to no forms is a positive factor. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations are evident. The business should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy documentation to improve security posture and regulatory compliance. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

colophon

Description:

A graphic design studio and type-design research initiative (*latent stare*) located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Key Services:
Commissioned graphic design and exhibition scenographyResearch and type-design initiativesFree font creation and distributionTeaching, guest lecturing, and advising
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSCustom font-face (LincolnMITRE-LM5x7)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a portfolio and informational site for a graphic design and type-design research studio.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

16 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:45.63.26.49
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1720694946, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with a custom font-face but lacks modern web frameworks or CMS. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are detected, indicating a minimalistic approach. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. The absence of meta tags beyond title and charset limits SEO effectiveness. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience and security.
Analyze Another Website