Skip to main content

Is com.de a Scam? Security Check Results - .COM.DE Reviews

com.de favicon

Is com.de Safe? Security Analysis for .COM.DE

Check if com.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Underscore.js+3 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 11:25:45 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website com.de operates as a domain registry service offering .COM.DE domain registrations as a flexible alternative to the traditional .DE domains, targeting businesses seeking a German market presence without local residency restrictions. It positions itself as a niche player combining German identity with global accessibility, catering to both local German businesses and international companies entering Germany. The site provides domain search and registration services, supported by a partnership with Gen.xyz for customer support and abuse handling. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with jQuery and Underscore.js, and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes. Hosting is inferred to be via CentralNic, a known domain registry provider. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices but lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance and user privacy. Incident response is facilitated through Gen.xyz's abuse team, but no dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page is present. The WHOIS data is consistent with a legitimate domain registry operation but lacks detailed registrant information. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for its domain registration services with moderate security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy mechanisms, and direct contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Underscore.jsBootstrap GridGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets a specialized market segment by offering .COM.DE domains as an alternative to .DE, addressing the challenge of domain scarcity in Germany's competitive digital market. Its business model revolves around domain registration and sales, leveraging partnerships with established providers like Gen.xyz for support services. The company appeals to both local German businesses and international brands, positioning itself as a flexible and accessible option without residency restrictions. The lack of direct company registration details and phone contacts suggests a lean operation focused on domain services rather than broader enterprise functions. The partnership ecosystem includes CentralNic for DNS and registry infrastructure and Gen.xyz for customer support, indicating a reliance on trusted third parties to deliver core services.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit GDPR compliance indicators poses privacy compliance risks. Incident response is managed through a partner abuse team, but no dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is published. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a domain registry front-end but would benefit from enhanced security controls and privacy transparency to meet higher compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

.COM.DE

Description:

Provides .COM.DE domain registrations as a flexible alternative to .DE domains, targeting businesses seeking German market presence without local restrictions.

Key Services:
Domain registrationDomain searchDomain support and abuse handling
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 3.5.1Underscore.jsBootstrap GridGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Bootstrap (grid system)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://com.de)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides a niche domain registration service targeting German market.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:googlemail.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:54.153.56.183
Name Servers:
ns1.centralnic.net
ns2.centralnic.net
ns3.centralnic.net
ns4.centralnic.net
MX Records:
10: mail.cash9.com
SOA:Serial: 3000562676, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:googlemail.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and standard technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Underscore.js, and Bootstrap grid for responsive design. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting is inferred to be with CentralNic, a reputable domain registry provider. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of security headers and absence of cookie consent mechanisms which could impact compliance and security posture.
Analyze Another Website