Skip to main content

Is commonpaper.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Common Paper Reviews

commonpaper.com favicon

Is commonpaper.com Safe? Security Analysis for Common Paper

Check if commonpaper.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPressGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsHeap AnalyticsjQuery+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:15:49 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Common Paper, Inc. is a technology company specializing in contract collaboration, negotiation, signing, and billing solutions primarily targeting revenue, legal, and sales teams. Founded in 2017, the company offers a SaaS platform that integrates AI agents to streamline contract workflows, positioning itself as a niche player in the legal tech market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging and customer trust signals such as testimonials and partner logos. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Understrap theme, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices, though performance is moderate. Hosting appears to be via WordPress.com infrastructure. Security practices include HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but lack DNSSEC and advanced security headers. From a security perspective, the site maintains a good baseline with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and cookie consent mechanisms despite using tracking scripts, which may pose compliance risks. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Common Paper presents a credible and professional online presence with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in DNS security, privacy compliance, and security transparency would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsHeap AnalyticsjQueryMonsterInsightsJetpackSimple Banner plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Common Paper operates in the legal technology sector, focusing on contract lifecycle management enhanced by AI capabilities. Its SaaS business model targets revenue and legal teams seeking efficiency in contract workflows. The company leverages partnerships and endorsements from reputable clients like Figma, indicating market acceptance. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and premium AI negotiation features. The website's content and structure suggest a growth-oriented approach with emphasis on user experience and trust. The absence of physical addresses or phone numbers indicates a primarily digital-first operation. The company maintains active social media engagement on Twitter and LinkedIn, supporting brand visibility and customer engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

t*****@commonpaper.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a foundational security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and domain transfer lock status. However, the absence of DNSSEC implementation and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents areas for enhancement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events and reduce user trust. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts without a visible cookie consent mechanism may raise privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Common Paper

Description:

Common Paper powers contract collaboration, negotiation, signing, and billing for revenue teams. Build trusted templates using our standard agreements, then leverage AI agents to negotiate, sign, and manage your contracts in a single workflow.

Key Services:
contract collaborationcontract negotiationcontract signingbilling for revenue teamsAI contract negotiation agent
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsHeap AnalyticsjQueryMonsterInsightsJetpackSimple Banner plugin
Frameworks:
Understrap WordPress theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHeap AnalyticsJetpack Stats
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Heap AnalyticsJetpack StatsUSBrowserSpeed
Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsightsSimple Banner plugin
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses WordPress CMS with Understrap theme.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.149, 192.0.78.216
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.comDNS only
ns2.wordpress.comDNS only
ns3.wordpress.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2005071858, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Understrap theme, indicating a standard and widely supported infrastructure. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, which provide robust data collection capabilities but require privacy compliance attention. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting is likely via WordPress.com given the nameservers. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt or deprecated libraries detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS security to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website