Skip to main content

Is comparably.com a Scam? Security Check Results - comparably.com Reviews

C

Is comparably.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if comparably.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
PerimeterXCloudflare Insights
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:09:55 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.comparably.com is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) and bot mitigation system implemented by PerimeterX and Cloudflare. This security layer blocks automated access and presents a captcha challenge, preventing retrieval of meaningful website content. Consequently, no business descriptions, contact information, or policy documents are available for analysis. The domain WHOIS data is also unavailable, with the registry returning no match, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and legitimacy. Technically, the site employs advanced security technologies but this limits external analysis. Overall, the security posture is strong in terms of protection but transparency and accessibility are lacking, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterXCloudflare Insights

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be protected or possibly unregistered in public WHOIS databases. No information on market positioning, business model, or partnerships is available. The presence of PerimeterX and Cloudflare suggests a focus on security and bot protection, possibly indicating a business with sensitive or high-value data. However, without content access, no insights into revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators can be provided.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a high level of security through the use of PerimeterX bot mitigation and Cloudflare's security services. These tools effectively block unauthorized or automated access, reducing risk from scraping, DDoS, and other attacks. However, the lack of visible security headers, privacy policies, or contact information limits the ability to assess compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust evaluation. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not detectable. Overall, the security posture is protective but lacks transparency and public compliance indicators.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Allow controlled access to website content for legitimate users and security analysts to enable transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

Page content is blocked by PerimeterX bot mitigation and Cloudflare security mechanisms, showing an access denied captcha challenge.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterXCloudflare Insights

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of PerimeterX bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking Level:moderate

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Cloudflare Insights

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to WAF and bot mitigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.comparably.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:e8352ad7@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:e8352ad7@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2704 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:50.18.33.93, 3.101.71.88
Name Servers:
ns-1133.awsdns-13.org
ns-160.awsdns-20.com
ns-1895.awsdns-44.co.uk
ns-964.awsdns-56.net
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.comparably.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses PerimeterX and Cloudflare technologies for security and analytics, indicating a modern and robust infrastructure focused on protection against bots and attacks. However, the content is completely blocked by these security layers, preventing evaluation of the underlying CMS, frameworks, or hosting environment. No metadata, structured data, or forms are accessible. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed. The presence of Google Fonts and Cloudflare Insights scripts suggests some standard web technologies are in use. Overall, the technical implementation is advanced in security but opaque in content delivery and user experience.
Analyze Another Website