Is compound.blue Safe? Security Analysis for Compound DAO
Check if compound.blue is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Compound Blue is a community-built decentralized finance (DeFi) platform interface focused on lending and borrowing assets on the Polygon blockchain network. It operates independently but within the Compound DAO ecosystem and integrates with the Morpho protocol. The platform targets DeFi users seeking yield on their crypto assets through lending and borrowing services. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using React and Next.js, hosted likely on Vercel, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, though explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in crypto projects, and the site links to reputable partners such as Morpho and Compound, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the platform presents a professional and trustworthy interface for DeFi lending on Polygon.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The platform positions itself as a specialized interface for Compound-managed deployments on the Morpho protocol, focusing on the Polygon network. Its business model revolves around facilitating decentralized lending and borrowing, earning yield for users. The project benefits from partnerships with Compound DAO, Morpho, Polygon, and Gauntlet, indicating a strong ecosystem collaboration. Revenue likely derives from performance fees on vaults and lending activities. The target customers are crypto investors and DeFi participants seeking efficient yield strategies. The open-source nature and community-driven development suggest transparency and innovation focus. The presence of multiple vaults and asset support indicates a growing and diversified service offering.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive information in its HTML content. It uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools with minimal tracking. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present, which could impact incident response readiness. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may pose privacy compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and adding user privacy controls.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Compound DAO
DeFi lending and borrowing interface for Compound-managed deployments on the Morpho protocol.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a DeFi lending and borrowing interface on Polygon network
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 86 days
HSTS Missing includeSubDomains
LOWHSTS header does not include subdomains
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings