Skip to main content

Is constructionsafety.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - Construction Safety Association of Manitoba Reviews

constructionsafety.ca favicon

Is constructionsafety.ca Safe? Security Analysis for Construction Safety Association of Manitoba

https://constructionsafety.ca

Check if constructionsafety.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCanadamedium
WordPressPHPBootstrapjQueryGoogle Analytics+6 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 2:41:45 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The Construction Safety Association of Manitoba (CSAM) operates as a trusted regional non-profit organization providing comprehensive safety and health training, certification programs such as COR® and SECOR®, consulting services, and a wide range of safety resources targeted at the construction industry in Manitoba, Canada. Their market position is strong within the regional construction safety sector, supported by professional content and active social media engagement. The website reflects a well-structured digital presence with clear navigation and relevant content for their audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and Genesis, integrating various plugins for enhanced functionality including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Presto Player. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks important security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are critical for compliance and protection. Security-wise, the site does not expose sensitive data and uses standard tracking tools, but the absence of a cookie consent banner and security policies indicates gaps in privacy compliance. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the risk is moderate with recommendations to enhance security headers, privacy compliance, and verify domain registration details. Strategically, CSAM should focus on improving privacy compliance by implementing cookie consent and publishing security and incident response policies. Enhancing security headers will strengthen defense against common web attacks. Verifying and updating WHOIS information will improve trustworthiness and domain legitimacy. These steps will solidify their digital trust and compliance posture while maintaining their leadership in construction safety training in Manitoba.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarPresto PlayerMy Calendar pluginElementorFontAwesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CSAM holds a leading position in the Manitoba construction safety training market, leveraging certifications like COR® and SECOR® as key differentiators. Their business model is centered on providing educational services, certification, and consulting to construction companies and workers, primarily in Manitoba. Revenue streams likely include training fees, certification audits, and consulting engagements. The organization targets construction firms, safety managers, and workers seeking compliance and safety improvements. Their partnership ecosystem includes industry councils and safety organizations, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth indicators include active event promotion, training blitzes, and digital engagement through social media and webinars. The website's professional presentation and comprehensive service offerings support sustained market presence and potential expansion opportunities.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@constructionsafety.ca

Phone Numbers (2)

120*******
120*******

Company Registration

Registration Number:

Registration Now

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

CSAM's security maturity is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS, uses reputable analytics and tracking tools, and does not expose sensitive information in its HTML content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit privacy compliance features indicates potential GDPR and privacy regulation gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency are recommended to elevate the security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Construction Safety Association of Manitoba

Description:

Premier and trusted source for safety and health information, resources, tools, training, and COR®/SECOR® Certification in Manitoba.

Key Services:
Safety training (online, classroom, job site)COR® and SECOR® certification programsConsulting servicesSafety resources and downloadsIndustry news and events
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarPresto PlayerMy Calendar pluginElementorFontAwesome
Frameworks:
Genesis FrameworkBootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Hotjar
Marketing Tools:
ExactMetrics (Google Analytics plugin)Google Language Translator
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

12/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ptr ip4:205.200.64.237 ip4:184.68.75.210 ip4:23.229.229.86 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(30 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:144.217.248.187
Name Servers:
ns51.domaincontrol.com
ns52.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
0: constructionsafety-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Genesis Framework and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates multiple plugins such as Elementor for page building, Presto Player for media, My Calendar for event management, and ExactMetrics for Google Analytics integration. The site loads JavaScript libraries including jQuery and uses FontAwesome for icons. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from improved accessibility and security hardening.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about constructionsafety.ca

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website