Skip to main content

Is contrary.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Contrary Reviews

contrary.com favicon

Is contrary.com Safe? Security Analysis for Contrary

Check if contrary.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSWeb Fonts
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:07:48 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Contrary is a technology-focused investment firm that leverages technology and research to identify and invest in exceptional entrepreneurs and their companies. The firm positions itself as a niche player in the venture capital space, focusing on early to growth-stage startups. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, providing a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms. However, the lack of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website presents a credible and trustworthy business front with room for improvement in security and contact transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSWeb Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Contrary operates as a research-driven venture capital firm targeting technology startups. Its business model centers on investing in a small number of high-potential entrepreneurs from seed to scale. The firm publishes research insights and maintains a portfolio of companies, indicating a focus on thought leadership and active portfolio management. External links to job portals and research subdomains suggest a comprehensive ecosystem supporting startups. The absence of explicit contact information may indicate a preference for controlled communication channels. The firm’s market positioning is that of a specialized, technology-savvy investor with a medium-sized operational footprint.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS were detected in the provided HTML snippet, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional headers and published security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy including incident response contacts.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Contrary

Description:

We combine technology and research to identify and invest in a small number of exceptional people and the companies they build.

Key Services:
investmentresearchportfolio support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSSWeb Fonts
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • secure forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:reports@contrary.com
Forensic Reports:forensic@contrary.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(643 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.142, 76.76.21.164
Name Servers:
gwen.ns.cloudflare.com
noel.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382508284, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and optimized asset loading for performance. It uses web fonts and responsive design techniques to ensure excellent mobile optimization and accessibility. The site structure includes JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social media meta tags for sharing. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. Performance appears fast with preloading of fonts and images. The technical implementation is modern and well-executed, supporting a professional business presence.
Analyze Another Website