Skip to main content

Is conversoes.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Dan's Tools Reviews

conversoes.org favicon

Is conversoes.org Safe? Security Analysis for Dan's Tools

Check if conversoes.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5JavaScriptjQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.0.3+4 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:42:04 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Files-conversion.com is a small-scale technology website operated under the brand Dan's Tools, offering free online file conversion services primarily focused on video formats but also supporting audio, image, document, and archive conversions. The site is monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and uses Google Analytics for user tracking. The technical infrastructure is based on standard web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and plupload for file uploads, with assets served partially via Cloudfront CDN. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenge, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status, although the site is active and functional. Overall, the site serves a niche utility function with moderate technical maturity and basic privacy and security practices.

Detected Technologies

HTML5JavaScriptjQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.0.3Google Fontsplupload (file uploader library)Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website operates in the technology sector, targeting general internet users who require free and easy file format conversions. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, with no evident paid services or subscriptions. The site is part of a broader ecosystem of tools under the Dan's Tools brand, indicating a partnership or parent relationship. The lack of detailed business contact information and WHOIS transparency limits trust and credibility. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its broad format support and free access. Growth potential may be constrained by limited branding and minimal privacy compliance. Strategic partnerships appear limited to related utility sites within the Dan's Tools network.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of files-conversion.com is basic. The site uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected in the HTML content. Forms are present for login and registration but lack visible advanced security features. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of cookie consent despite tracking scripts indicates a gap in privacy compliance. The domain’s WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy and may pose risks. Overall, the site should improve security headers, privacy mechanisms, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dan's Tools

Description:

Files-conversion.com provides a free online service to convert video files between many video formats and also supports audio, image, document, archive, and other file format conversions.

Key Services:
Video file format conversionAudio file conversionImage file conversionDocument file conversionArchive file conversion
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5JavaScriptjQueryBootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.0.3Google Fontsplupload (file uploader library)Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseEzoic
Marketing Tools:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website offers free online file conversion services primarily for video files.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

94 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:34.202.133.59, 34.200.98.251
Name Servers:
ns-1174.awsdns-18.orgDNS only
ns-1838.awsdns-37.co.ukDNS only
ns-57.awsdns-07.comDNS only
ns-924.awsdns-51.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap 3.4.1. It uses plupload for file uploads and Google Fonts for typography. The site loads assets from multiple external domains including Cloudfront CDN and Google services. Performance is moderate with some use of asynchronous scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags but could be improved. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The site lacks modern security headers and advanced privacy features. Technical debt is indicated by use of older Bootstrap and Font Awesome versions. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, enhance security, and improve user experience.
Analyze Another Website