Skip to main content

Is cookiehub.net a Scam? Security Check Results - cookiehub.net Reviews

C

Is cookiehub.net Safe? Security Analysis for cookiehub.net

Check if cookiehub.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:37:43 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at cookiehub.net currently presents only minimal content, consisting solely of the text 'CookieHub' with no additional metadata, policies, or contact information. The domain is registered since 2018 with a reputable registrar and hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, indicating a legitimate technical foundation. However, the lack of substantive website content and absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies significantly limit the site's business credibility and user trust. Technically, no scripts, frameworks, or security headers are detected, and no HTTPS or SSL configuration details are available, suggesting a poor security posture. Overall, the site appears to be either under development or improperly maintained, with critical gaps in compliance and security.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Based on the domain registration and minimal content, the business appears to be in the technology sector, possibly related to cookie consent or privacy management given the domain name. However, no explicit business description, services, or contact details are provided, limiting insights into market positioning or business model. The domain age is consistent with a small technology company founded in 2018. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of visible business information and trust indicators suggests the site is not currently positioned strongly in its market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and any visible security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not demonstrate GDPR compliance or data protection officer contact information. These gaps expose the site to potential compliance risks and reduce user trust. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, indicating no active protection against automated threats. Overall, the security maturity level is low.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal, consisting only of the text 'CookieHub'.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dacoda.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:email.freshdesk.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:noc@cookiehub.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.110, 3.174.113.59, 3.174.113.27, 3.174.113.120
Name Servers:
ns-1316.awsdns-36.orgDNS only
ns-1690.awsdns-19.co.ukDNS only
ns-225.awsdns-28.comDNS only
ns-704.awsdns-24.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: cookiehub-net.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.dacoda.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:email.freshdesk.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website's technical footprint is minimal with no detectable scripts, frameworks, or CMS. DNS records indicate hosting on Amazon AWS via standard AWS nameservers. The HTML content is a bare minimum placeholder with no metadata or SEO tags. No analytics or advertising technologies are present. The lack of technical sophistication and content suggests the site is either in early development or abandoned. Performance, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content.
Analyze Another Website