Skip to main content

Is cookup.ai a Scam? Security Check Results - Cookup.AI Reviews

cookup.ai favicon

Is cookup.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Cookup.AI

Check if cookup.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 4:53:34 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Cookup.AI is a small technology startup founded in 2022, offering a personal AI assistant service with built-in memory capabilities. The website branding and metadata emphasize the AI assistant functionality, targeting a general audience interested in AI productivity tools. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging React and Next.js frameworks, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, indicating a contemporary digital maturity level. However, the website content is minimal and lacks comprehensive business and compliance information. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks security headers and privacy policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the site is functional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business credibility to improve trust and user confidence.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cookup.AI positions itself as an emerging AI assistant provider in the technology sector, focusing on personal productivity enhancements through AI with memory features. The business model appears to be service-oriented, likely subscription or usage-based, targeting individual users or small businesses. The domain age and registration details align with a recently founded startup. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications are evident, suggesting early-stage operations. The lack of contact and policy information may hinder customer acquisition and regulatory compliance. Growth potential exists if the company expands transparency, security, and compliance measures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting preparedness for security incidents. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS is justified for a small tech startup but reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and incident readiness to meet industry best practices and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cookup.AI

Description:

Your personal AI Assistant with built-in memory!

Key Services:
AI assistant with built-in memory
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:zcsend.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.48.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001
Name Servers:
oswald.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
sara.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2378133931, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:zcsend.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. Hosting uses Cloudflare DNS, providing reliable DNS resolution and potential CDN benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. SEO metadata is present but minimal. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Technical debt appears low but the absence of security headers and compliance documentation indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Analyze Another Website