Skip to main content

Is corenic.org a Scam? Security Check Results - CORE Association Reviews

corenic.org favicon

Is corenic.org Safe? Security Analysis for CORE Association

Check if corenic.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySwitzerlandsmall
jQuery 2.2.4Google Tag ManagerGoogle Fonts (Lato)Bootstrap (implied by classes and glyphicons)
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:33:52 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CORE Association is a well-established not-for-profit registry service provider based in Switzerland, operating more than 25 top-level domains (TLDs) since 2001. The organization offers comprehensive services including registry management, registry software, consultancy, and brand development tailored to various types of TLDs such as open, community, geographic, brand, IDNs, and ccTLDs. Their clientele includes Fortune 500 companies, intergovernmental organizations, governments, and grassroots non-profits, positioning CORE as a trusted and experienced player in the domain registry industry. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, clear navigation, and professional design quality. Performance is moderate, with opportunities for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The technical infrastructure appears stable and appropriate for the organization's needs. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and domain registration statuses that prevent unauthorized changes. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which are recommended to enhance DNS and web security. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response contact is provided via a dedicated abuse/legal email address, but no formal security policy or vulnerability disclosure program is present. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a high level of legitimacy and professionalism. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a notable compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy compliance would strengthen the organization's security posture and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4Google Tag ManagerGoogle Fonts (Lato)Bootstrap (implied by classes and glyphicons)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CORE Association holds a strong market position as a niche registry service provider with a long operational history since 1998 and active TLD operations since 2001. Their not-for-profit business model focuses on community and geographic TLDs, serving a diverse client base including governments and large enterprises. The partnership ecosystem includes related entities such as corehub.net, which acts as their registrar. The organization leverages custom solutions and brand development services to differentiate itself. Growth indicators include continuous service offerings and a broad portfolio of TLDs. The website content and structure reflect a mature and stable operation with clear business focus and professional communication.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@corenic.org
l*****@corenic.org

Phone Numbers (2)

+4122312****
+4122312****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration statuses provide protection against unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. The organization is recognized by ICANN as the first European Emergency Back End Registry Operator, indicating a strong commitment to DNS security and stability. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were found in the website content. Incident response contact is clearly provided, but no formal security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is published. Compliance with GDPR is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and integrity.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CORE Association

Description:

CORE Association is a registry service provider operating more than 25 TLDs, offering registry management, registry software, consultancy, and brand development services. It is a not-for-profit organization focused on community and geographic TLD registries, providing custom-made solutions for open, community, geographic, brand, IDNs, and ccTLDs. Trusted by Fortune 500 companies, IGOs, governments, and grassroots non-profits worldwide.

Key Services:
Registry ManagementRegistry SoftwareConsultancy ServicesBrand Development
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4Google Tag ManagerGoogle Fonts (Lato)Bootstrap (implied by classes and glyphicons)
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses set
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.215.216.25 ip4:195.70.10.88 ip4:195.70.10.111 ip4:84.88.228.33 ip4:212.20.160.10/24 ip4:195.253.23.190/24 include:spf.post.atech.io include:in.sirportly.com include:_spf.google.com a:mxout01.corenic.net -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:znqmycs8@ag.eu.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:znqmycs8@fr.eu.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

21 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.1TLSv1.3TLSv1.2

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:178.238.230.17
Name Servers:
hk21.irondns.netDNS only
us19-east.irondns.netDNS only
us20-west.irondns.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2022112802, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:332ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.215.216.25 ip4:195.70.10.88 ip4:195.70.10.111 ip4:84.88.228.33 ip4:212.20.160.10/24 ip4:195.253.23.190/24 include:spf.post.atech.io include:in.sirportly.com include:_spf.google.com a:mxout01.corenic.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery 2.2.4 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The use of Google Fonts (Lato) and Bootstrap-like classes indicates a modern but somewhat dated tech stack. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. No critical technical debt or errors were detected in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for the organization's operational needs.
Analyze Another Website