Skip to main content

Is cosocial.info a Scam? Security Check Results - CoSocial Community Cooperative Reviews

cosocial.info favicon

Is cosocial.info Safe? Security Analysis for CoSocial Community Cooperative

Check if cosocial.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitCanadasmall
WordPress 6.8.2GeneratePress themeGoogle Fonts (Nunito)Rank Math SEO pluginWP Emoji+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:49:49 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CoSocial Community Cooperative operates a member-owned, democratically-run open social media platform focused on the Canadian market. Positioned as a non-profit alternative to corporate social media, it aims to foster justice, equity, and inclusivity. The website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility features, providing a good user experience and clear navigation. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and contact policies present transparency and compliance gaps. Security posture is decent with HTTPS enforced but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the platform is credible and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2GeneratePress themeGoogle Fonts (Nunito)Rank Math SEO pluginWP EmojiJSON-LD structured data

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The cooperative targets Canadian users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media, leveraging the Mastodon ecosystem. Its business model is cooperative membership-based, emphasizing democratic governance and community ownership. The platform's niche positioning as a non-profit social media alternative differentiates it from commercial competitors. The presence of related domains for member discourse indicates an engaged community ecosystem. Growth potential is tied to increasing dissatisfaction with corporate social media. However, limited public contact and policy transparency may hinder broader adoption and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@cosocial.ca

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, reflecting a baseline security maturity. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could delay response to security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, security practices are adequate but require formalization and enhancement to meet best practices for non-profit digital platforms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CoSocial Community Cooperative

Description:

CoSocial, officially CoSocial Community Cooperative, is a member-owned organization with the purpose of providing democratically-run open social media.

Key Services:
Democratically-run open social media platformCommunity cooperative membership
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2GeneratePress themeGoogle Fonts (Nunito)Rank Math SEO pluginWP EmojiJSON-LD structured data
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and image URLs using https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Rank Math SEO
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based cooperative social media platform for Canada

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:mail.cosocial.ca a:my.cosocial.info ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(1899 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:174.138.114.114
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.com
ns2.digitalocean.com
ns3.digitalocean.com
MX Records:
10: mail.cosocial.ca
SOA:Serial: 1754428099, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:mail.cosocial.ca a:my.cosocial.info ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the GeneratePress theme and Rank Math SEO plugin, ensuring good SEO and accessibility. The use of Google Fonts and emoji scripts is standard. Performance is moderate with responsive design and good mobile optimization. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. However, the hosting provider is not identified, and no advanced security or performance optimizations (e.g., CDN, caching plugins) are evident from the HTML source. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website