Skip to main content

Is cottonclassic.com a Scam? Security Check Results - cottonclassic.com Reviews

C

Is cottonclassic.com Safe? Security Analysis for cottonclassic.com

Check if cottonclassic.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 4:46:26 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website cottonclassic.com appears to be inactive or parked, with minimal content consisting primarily of a hidden tracking image and an iframe embedding content from a suspicious external domain. There is no visible business information, contact details, or privacy and cookie policies, which severely limits the ability to assess the site's legitimacy or business operations. The domain is registered since 2004 but uses nameservers indicating it is for sale, suggesting it is not currently in active use for a legitimate business. Technically, the site lacks modern web standards, security headers, and SEO optimization, and the embedded iframe raises potential security concerns. Overall, the site exhibits poor content quality, weak technical implementation, and a low security posture.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No meaningful business intelligence can be derived from the current website content. The absence of company details, contact information, or service descriptions indicates the domain is likely parked or unused. The domain age suggests it may have been used previously, but current indicators show no active business presence or market positioning. There are no signs of partnerships, certifications, or business model information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS information, absence of security headers, and the presence of an iframe loading content from an untrusted external source. The domain's DNS setup with nameservers pointing to domain-for-sale services further reduces trust. No incident response or security policies are found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. These factors indicate a high risk of security issues if the site were to be used actively.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Remove or thoroughly audit the embedded iframe content to eliminate potential security risks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
10/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly consists of a hidden 0x0 pixel image and an iframe embedding content from a suspicious external domain.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

No Name Servers Found

HIGH

Unable to find name servers for domain

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(166 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:208.91.197.195
Name Servers:
ns.buydomains.comWHOIS only
this-domain-for-sale.comWHOIS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website lacks any detectable CMS or modern frameworks and does not include metadata or structured data. The HTML content is minimal and includes a hidden tracking image and an iframe from a suspicious domain. There is no evidence of performance optimization or accessibility features. The domain uses suspicious nameservers indicating it is parked or for sale, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is poor and outdated, with significant modernization needed to support a legitimate business presence.
Analyze Another Website