Skip to main content

Is counter-forms.com a Scam? Security Check Results - counter-forms.com Reviews

counter-forms.com favicon

Is counter-forms.com Safe? Security Analysis for Counter Forms

Check if counter-forms.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
React (Next.js)JavaScriptStripe (payment processing)Sanity.io (CMS and media hosting)Web fonts (woff2)+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:02:59 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Counter Forms is a specialized online platform dedicated to promoting young and discursive type designers primarily from the Antipodean region. The website offers a curated collection of typefaces, insightful articles on typography, and interactive tools such as a PPP Table & Calculator. It positions itself as a niche player in the typography and design community with a focus on cultural and political aspects of type design. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Next.js, React, and is hosted on Vercel with content managed via Sanity.io. Payment processing is securely handled through Stripe, ensuring safe transactions. The website demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and a professional design aesthetic. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No direct contact information or security incident response details are provided, which could hinder user confidence and compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but should enhance its privacy and security disclosures to align with best practices.

Detected Technologies

React (Next.js)JavaScriptStripe (payment processing)Sanity.io (CMS and media hosting)Web fonts (woff2)Video embedding

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates as a small, niche typographic venture founded in 2023, focusing on showcasing and selling typefaces and publishing related content. Its target audience includes designers, typographers, and enthusiasts interested in contemporary and culturally aware typography. The business model revolves around content publication and digital sales of fonts. The platform leverages partnerships with payment processors like Stripe and CMS providers like Sanity.io. Growth potential lies in expanding its community and offerings within the typography niche. The lack of explicit business contact details and privacy policies may limit broader market trust and compliance with international regulations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website maintains a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure payment integration via Stripe. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for transparency and readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and DNS security.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Counter Forms is a new typographic venture that seeks to champion young, discursive, Antipodean type designers.

Key Services:
Showcasing typefacesPublishing texts/articles on typographyProviding a workroom and tools such as PPP Table & CalculatorOffering typeface sales
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React (Next.js)JavaScriptStripe (payment processing)Sanity.io (CMS and media hosting)Web fonts (woff2)Video embedding
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Vercel (hosting and DNS)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Stripe for secure payment processing

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a niche typographic platform focused on emerging designers from the Antipodean region.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.16.129, 216.150.16.193
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.comDNS only
ns2.vercel-dns.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.protonmail.ch
20: mailsec.protonmail.ch

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering and static generation capabilities, hosted on Vercel, which ensures fast performance and scalability. The use of Sanity.io as a headless CMS allows flexible content management and media hosting. Integration with Stripe provides secure payment processing. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern web fonts and video content effectively. However, there is no evidence of advanced accessibility features beyond basic support. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates some technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and modern but can benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website