Skip to main content

Is cow.fi a Scam? Security Check Results - CoW DAO Reviews

cow.fi favicon

Is cow.fi Safe? Security Analysis for CoW DAO

Check if cow.fi is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyPortugalmedium
ReactNext.jsAWS Route53 DNSGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft Clarity+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:06:08 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

CoW DAO is a technology-focused decentralized autonomous organization specializing in developing user-protective products within the Ethereum ecosystem. Their offerings include an open-source DEX aggregation protocol, a decentralized exchange (CoW Swap), a MEV-capturing automated market maker (CoW AMM), and MEV protection services. The organization emphasizes security, user protection, and community governance through token holder participation. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and active community engagement channels.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsAWS Route53 DNSGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityTwitter Universal Website TagHypeLab AnalyticsSafary SDK

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CoW DAO positions itself as an innovator in the DeFi space, focusing on mitigating risks associated with MEV and improving user experience in decentralized trading. Their business model leverages open-source protocols and community governance, supported by grants and partnerships with established DeFi platforms like Balancer. The target audience includes Ethereum users, DeFi traders, and developers seeking secure and efficient trading solutions. The company demonstrates growth potential through active governance and ecosystem development initiatives.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Nomev Labs Lda

Registration Number:

PT516811924

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and modern security practices, though explicit security headers are not clearly visible in the HTML. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of direct security contact channels and cookie consent mechanisms suggests areas for improvement in compliance and incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly document a cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

CoW DAO

Description:

CoW DAO develops the most user-protective products in Ethereum, focusing on DeFi innovations such as DEX aggregation, MEV protection, and AMM solutions.

Key Services:
CoW Protocol - DEX aggregationCoW Swap - Decentralized exchangeCoW AMM - MEV-capturing automated market makerMEV Blocker - MEV protection RPC
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsAWS Route53 DNSGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityTwitter Universal Website TagHypeLab AnalyticsSafary SDK
Frameworks:
ReactNext.js
Platforms:
AWS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS frameworks
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Microsoft ClarityHypeLab Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Twitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityGoogle Analytics via GTMTwitter Universal Website TagHypeLab Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HypeLab Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@cow.fi

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1002.awsdns-61.netDNS only
ns-1378.awsdns-44.orgDNS only
ns-1917.awsdns-47.co.ukDNS only
ns-90.awsdns-11.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:112ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using React and Next.js frameworks, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS nameservers. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Twitter Ads, and HypeLab Analytics. The site demonstrates fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. There is no evidence of CMS usage, indicating a custom-built solution. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional and scalable online presence.
Analyze Another Website