Skip to main content

Is crossref.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Crossref Reviews

crossref.org favicon

Is crossref.org Safe? Security Analysis for Crossref

Check if crossref.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationN/alarge
Hugo static site generatorBootstrap CSSjQueryFont Awesome iconsAlgolia search+6 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:38:16 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Crossref is a leading non-profit organization providing open infrastructure to link research objects and metadata, supporting the global scholarly community with over 23,000 members in 163 countries. Their platform facilitates nearly 2 billion monthly API queries, enabling efficient metadata exchange and open science communication. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Hugo, Bootstrap, jQuery, and Algolia search, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Crossref demonstrates high trustworthiness and professionalism, though WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is justified given the organization's nature.

Detected Technologies

Hugo static site generatorBootstrap CSSjQueryFont Awesome iconsAlgolia searchMatomo analyticsUsersnap feedback widgetVimeo player APIDataTablesMasonry layoutMathJax

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Crossref occupies a critical niche in the scholarly publishing ecosystem, providing essential metadata services that underpin open science. Their business model is membership-based, serving publishers, researchers, funders, and service providers. The organization leverages a large global network and offers a suite of services including content registration, grant linking, similarity checking, and event data. Their market position is strong, supported by extensive community engagement and recognition through metadata awards. The website content and structure support their mission and target audience effectively, with ongoing initiatives to improve metadata quality and equity in membership fees. Partnerships and community forums further enhance their ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses security best practices such as cookie consent and no exposed sensitive data. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response information available, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program is evident. The absence of direct security contact channels limits transparency in incident handling. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing formal security policies and providing clear incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Crossref

Description:

Crossref runs open infrastructure to link research objects, entities, and actions, creating a lasting and reusable scholarly record that underpins open science. Together with 23,000 members in 163 countries, they drive metadata exchange and support nearly 2 billion monthly API queries, facilitating global research communication for the benefit of society.

Key Services:
Metadata exchangeContent registrationGrant Linking SystemMetadata retrievalOpen Funder RegistryReference linkingSimilarity CheckCited-byEvent DataCrossmark
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Hugo static site generatorBootstrap CSSjQueryFont Awesome iconsAlgolia searchMatomo analyticsUsersnap feedback widgetVimeo player APIDataTablesMasonry layoutMathJax
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused cookies and consent banner
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
ActOn
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:208.254.38.64/27 ip4:108.26.163.24 ip4:18.233.120.246 include:mail.zendesk.com include:stspg-customer.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.intacct.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.act-on.net ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@crossref.org
Forensic Reports:dmarc@crossref.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(85 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:18.204.164.133, 3.230.54.71, 3.224.187.59, 18.210.250.11
Name Servers:
ns-1052.awsdns-03.org
ns-1629.awsdns-11.co.uk
ns-473.awsdns-59.com
ns-659.awsdns-18.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:208.254.38.64/27 ip4:108.26.163.24 ip4:18.233.120.246 include:mail.zendesk.com include:stspg-customer.com include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.intacct.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.act-on.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, combined with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Algolia for search functionality and Matomo for analytics, reflecting a modern and privacy-conscious tech stack. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices, with good accessibility features. Use of external libraries like Font Awesome and DataTables enhances UI/UX. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but likely cloud-based. There is no CMS detected beyond Hugo. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with opportunities to improve security header configurations and formalize security documentation.
Analyze Another Website