Skip to main content

Is cruffins.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Two More Beers LV, SIA Reviews

cruffins.lv favicon

Is cruffins.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Two More Beers LV, SIA

Check if cruffins.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
WordPress 6.8.2Oxygen BuilderAutomatic CSSjQuery 3.7.1Flickity Carousel+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:35:55 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Cruffins.lv is a specialized bakery cafe located in Riga, Latvia, focusing on a unique product called 'krafinu' which combines croissant and muffin textures with over 25 flavor options. The business positions itself as the only krafinu cafe in Riga, targeting local pastry and coffee enthusiasts. The website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers are lacking. Privacy compliance is addressed with a visible privacy policy and cookie banner. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information support business legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited for its niche hospitality market.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Oxygen BuilderAutomatic CSSjQuery 3.7.1Flickity CarouselFluent FormsComplianz GDPR pluginTranslatePress Multilingual

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a niche focus on artisanal pastries. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a unique product not widely available in the local market. The business model is direct retail with order placement via a contact form. The presence of social media channels and a privacy policy indicates a mature approach to customer engagement and compliance. The company appears small but well-branded and consistent in messaging. Partnerships include a hotel location (Konventa Sēta Hotel), enhancing market reach. Revenue streams likely come from in-store sales and custom orders. Growth potential exists through expanding flavor offerings and marketing.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@cruffins.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712800****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality business but could be improved with additional hardening and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Two More Beers LV, SIA

Description:

Cruffins.lv is a specialty bakery cafe located in Riga, Latvia, offering unique 'krafinu' pastries that combine croissant and muffin textures with over 25 flavor varieties. The business emphasizes artisanal quality and a unique gastronomic experience.

Key Services:
Sale of krafinu pastriesCoffee and beverage serviceOrder placement via contact form
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Oxygen BuilderAutomatic CSSjQuery 3.7.1Flickity CarouselFluent FormsComplianz GDPR pluginTranslatePress Multilingual
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content about bakery products.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:199.247.21.193
Name Servers:
ns1-32.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-32.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-32.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-32.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
0: cruffins-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress 6.8.2 with Oxygen Builder and several plugins such as Fluent Forms and Complianz GDPR for cookie management. The tech stack includes jQuery and Flickity for UI components. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses Google Fonts and external resources from trusted domains. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected.
Analyze Another Website