Skip to main content

Is crust.network a Scam? Security Check Results - crust.network Reviews

C

Is crust.network Safe? Security Analysis for Crust

Check if crust.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptNuxt.js
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:35:29 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website crust.network presents minimal accessible content, primarily consisting of technical scaffolding and JavaScript framework elements without substantive business or product descriptions. The site uses modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js but lacks visible SEO, accessibility, or user engagement features. No contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service are present, limiting user trust and compliance transparency. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable due to unsupported TLD WHOIS queries, which hinders verification of domain legitimacy and ownership details. Security posture is weak with no visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. Overall, the site appears to be in an early or placeholder state, with significant gaps in content, security, and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptNuxt.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business content and contact information, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning, business model, or target audience of crust.network. The domain name and title suggest a focus on blockchain or decentralized network technology, but no explicit services or products are described. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiary domains linked. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact details, indicates low business maturity and limited customer engagement. The site likely targets a technical or developer audience but currently lacks the content to support this effectively.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of crust.network is minimal. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details are available, and no security headers are detected in the provided data. There are no forms or input fields, reducing immediate attack surface, but also no mechanisms for secure user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency and trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices and compliance to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptNuxt.js
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly technical scaffolding without substantive business or product information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:hi@crust.network
Forensic Reports:hi@crust.network

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:crust.network
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/14/2025 (69 days)
SANs:crust.network, *.crust.network

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.97.1, 188.114.96.1
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3120::1, 2a06:98c1:3121::1
Name Servers:
cortney.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
keenan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: crust-network.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2380801685, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, and loads multiple JavaScript modules asynchronously. The site uses CSS variables for theming and supports light/dark modes. However, the content is minimal, with no visible metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No forms or interactive elements are present. Performance is likely moderate given the modular loading, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA or semantic enhancements detected. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta descriptions or keywords. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data.
Analyze Another Website